|
|
Lamps
Sansa
| Reputation: 104 | Group: | Overlord | Posts: | 14,181 | Joined: | Oct 1, 2013 |
| Post #1: 22nd Aug 2017 4:21 PM | |
I voted no because I'm against it unless it's day 1. "only early" is too subjective imo :p
I don't really like it, but gotta say I don't have very good arguments for that. Far in the game it's just meh... someone will have to read the whole thing, meh, the excuses, nothing to base a read on with that replacement, nah. | |
| | |
Lamps
Sansa
| Reputation: 104 | Group: | Overlord | Posts: | 14,181 | Joined: | Oct 1, 2013 |
| Post #2: 23rd Aug 2017 3:47 AM | |
|
Day one Lynchee should be able to replace an inactive if his role and knowledge of the game does not adversely affect the game. I.e., a lynched Mafia member no, a lynched townie yes depending on role |
I don't like that. If scum or whoever did effort to get rid of a dangerous player or someone they don't like then that should not come back to haunt them imo. I'd be out for revenge tbh lol. | |
| | |
Lamps
Sansa
| Reputation: 104 | Group: | Overlord | Posts: | 14,181 | Joined: | Oct 1, 2013 |
| Post #3: 23rd Aug 2017 5:34 AM | |
Active players can ruin vital roles too, like an SK making terrible kill choices that don't help them reach their wincon. It happens. | |
| | |
6 Users Viewing (6 Guests) |
|
|