|
Timmah
The Butcher
| Reputation: 94 | Group: | Legend | Posts: | 8,753 | Joined: | Jan 13, 2015 |
| Post #1: 21st May 2017 12:09 AM | |
I dunno anything but the writeup, but I have a few thoughts just from that.
1) lamps was a vig kill imo. He was scummy as fuck, and he actually lied about his role come to find out. Reminder: lying about your role isn't a town thing to do. I do get massaging the truth to make best use of your town role, but the point still stands.
2) I was blocked last night. No flavor. Same shit lamps described yesterday I guess.
3) Curtis was obviously janitored, so the mafia now likely has his rolemto claim. | |
| | |
Timmah
The Butcher
| Reputation: 94 | Group: | Legend | Posts: | 8,753 | Joined: | Jan 13, 2015 |
| Post #2: 21st May 2017 12:18 AM | |
|
How did Lamps lie about his role...? |
He claimed VT.
Other thoughts without reading anything today:
The spin and mittens lynches are going to be really helpful to look at. On day one I know there were mafia in thatnspin lynch as they got to hide behind DS claim and know that he wasn't mafia. There will have been mafia purposefully avoiding it too because they thought he'd flip town. Yesterday, the mafia knew mittens was not mafia, so they'd not hesitate to jump on the mittens lynch. Again, some may have stayed off knowing he could be town. On that count I'm looking at active players who did not vote mittens. | |
| | |
Timmah
The Butcher
| Reputation: 94 | Group: | Legend | Posts: | 8,753 | Joined: | Jan 13, 2015 |
| Post #3: 21st May 2017 1:09 AM | |
|
Lamps claiming for no reason was sus. The claim itself was not. |
I'm not so mad at what lamps claimed as I am that we have 2 dead town now that both lied in their claims. That shit helps scum, not town, usually | |
| | |
Timmah
The Butcher
| Reputation: 94 | Group: | Legend | Posts: | 8,753 | Joined: | Jan 13, 2015 |
| Post #4: 21st May 2017 1:16 AM | |
I don't understand Marc's play honestly. His insistence on a 2 Ned mafia doesn't make sense unless he's original mafia and wants Tom relate confusion. On the other hand his hardcore stances on the rest of everything, and his obvious attention his stances have taken do not scream scum. Quite the conundrum. | |
| | |
Timmah
The Butcher
| Reputation: 94 | Group: | Legend | Posts: | 8,753 | Joined: | Jan 13, 2015 |
| Post #5: 21st May 2017 1:17 AM | |
That should say second mafia. I'm drunk. Sue me. | |
| | |
Timmah
The Butcher
| Reputation: 94 | Group: | Legend | Posts: | 8,753 | Joined: | Jan 13, 2015 |
| Post #6: 21st May 2017 10:46 AM | |
|
|
It's also clear ds whole plan was to get spin lynched, hope he was bad, then catch a bad guy and spend day 2 bragging about it.
Instead he got himself and the watcher killed. |
To be fair.....DS did not get the watcher killed |
He 100% got the watcher lynched, even if he didn't do it on purpose. | |
| | |
Timmah
The Butcher
| Reputation: 94 | Group: | Legend | Posts: | 8,753 | Joined: | Jan 13, 2015 |
| Post #7: 21st May 2017 10:56 AM | |
On day 1:
Angi and Boc avoided choosing a side in the spin/DS lynch and voted Merc. Ahoda avoided it and lynched Patrick. Sock avoided it and lynched Curtis, and nofo avoided it and lynched Josh. I think there were several that didn't vote at all. If I am going to look at the DS and spin votes, I'm looking more at those that were hardcore in support of DS being truthful, when it was so painfully obvious he was lying, and those that flip flopped back and forth. I'd have to reread the day to really get into that and I'm hungover and don't want to do that right now.
On D2:
Curtis avoided the mittens lynch and voted vlady, and Angi avoided it and lynched Patrick. There were definitely several people that didn't lynch anyone (including myself). | |
| | |
6 Users Viewing (6 Guests) |
|
|