Primate @ 21/5/2017 9:56

farlig @ 21/5/2017 4:31 Lamps never specifically said "vanilla." He simply said no actions and as many stated no actions don't always get told they get role blocked. One or two others claimed VT on Lamp's behalf. Would those that argued no actions wouldn't be told agree or disagree that his role wouldn't be told he was blocked if the mod wasnt confirming a role block to someone without a night action this game? He did say vt

By all means, find VT or vanilla:

http://www.ndimforums.com/fe/thread.asp?threadid=5720&postsby=508

Helios Garabandia @ 21/5/2017 8:53

im317 @ 20/5/2017 23:20 im going to be a little annoyed if it turns out that the wording is off. it defiantly implied that any block able action would be blocked and any announceable action would be announced. to me it reads as if a ninja would be blocked but not announced and an unstoppable kill announced but not blocked. so yeah if my interpretation turns out to be wrong then i will be mildly annoyed because hosts should have worded it better imo. This. This right here. This is why I did not believe Mittens' Watcher claim. The only thing that should've been able to be announced and not be blocked is an unstoppable kill. So I'd still love to know how the hell DS ended up dead.

If u were stopped, you were announced


If u weren't stopped, I.e. An unstoppable kill, you weren't announced

farlig @ 21/5/2017 9:01

Primate @ 21/5/2017 9:56 farlig @ 21/5/2017 4:31 Lamps never specifically said "vanilla." He simply said no actions and as many stated no actions don't always get told they get role blocked. One or two others claimed VT on Lamp's behalf. Would those that argued no actions wouldn't be told agree or disagree that his role wouldn't be told he was blocked if the mod wasnt confirming a role block to someone without a night action this game? He did say vt By all means, find VT or vanilla: http://www.ndimforums.com/fe/thread.asp?threadid=5720&postsby=508

Day one at 3:54 pm

No vt for lamps

thisisbad @ 21/5/2017 9:03

Helios Garabandia @ 21/5/2017 8:53 im317 @ 20/5/2017 23:20 im going to be a little annoyed if it turns out that the wording is off. it defiantly implied that any block able action would be blocked and any announceable action would be announced. to me it reads as if a ninja would be blocked but not announced and an unstoppable kill announced but not blocked. so yeah if my interpretation turns out to be wrong then i will be mildly annoyed because hosts should have worded it better imo. This. This right here. This is why I did not believe Mittens' Watcher claim. The only thing that should've been able to be announced and not be blocked is an unstoppable kill. So I'd still love to know how the hell DS ended up dead. If u were stopped, you were announced If u weren't stopped, I.e. An unstoppable kill, you weren't announced

This is the way I read it too.

thisisbad @ 21/5/2017 9:05

No vt for lamps

Only if you choose to look at the wrong day

Dang even I missed that

Well played.

Primate @ 21/5/2017 9:07

thisisbad @ 21/5/2017 9:05 No vt for lamps Only if you choose to look at the wrong day

Can I choose a game where everyone is much nicer lol

Primate @ 21/5/2017 9:05

thisisbad @ 21/5/2017 9:03 Helios Garabandia @ 21/5/2017 8:53 im317 @ 20/5/2017 23:20 im going to be a little annoyed if it turns out that the wording is off. it defiantly implied that any block able action would be blocked and any announceable action would be announced. to me it reads as if a ninja would be blocked but not announced and an unstoppable kill announced but not blocked. so yeah if my interpretation turns out to be wrong then i will be mildly annoyed because hosts should have worded it better imo. This. This right here. This is why I did not believe Mittens' Watcher claim. The only thing that should've been able to be announced and not be blocked is an unstoppable kill. So I'd still love to know how the hell DS ended up dead. If u were stopped, you were announced If u weren't stopped, I.e. An unstoppable kill, you weren't announced This is the way I read it too.

I feel like we are going to spend half the day going over something we know to be true

thisisbad @ 21/5/2017 10:07

Primate @ 21/5/2017 9:07 thisisbad @ 21/5/2017 9:05 No vt for lamps Only if you choose to look at the wrong day Can I choose a game where everyone is much nicer lol

https://www.google.com/amp/www.polygon.com/platform/amp/2017/2/8/14539476/leaving-lyndow-review-gameplay

It's also clear ds whole plan was to get spin lynched, hope he was bad, then catch a bad guy and spend day 2 bragging about it.

Instead he got himself and the watcher killed.

The way I see it, we either focus on the lynch and pressure those who were hard selling it, or ignore it d look at completely unrelated reads.

Primate @ 21/5/2017 10:11

The way I see it, we either focus on the lynch and pressure those who were hard selling it, or ignore it d look at completely unrelated reads.

Go for the lynch. Always better to go off of actual content and data.

thisisbad @ 21/5/2017 9:07

Primate @ 21/5/2017 9:07 thisisbad @ 21/5/2017 9:05 No vt for lamps Only if you choose to look at the wrong day Can I choose a game where everyone is much nicer lol

thisisbad @ 21/5/2017 9:07

Primate @ 21/5/2017 9:07 thisisbad @ 21/5/2017 9:05 No vt for lamps Only if you choose to look at the wrong day Can I choose a game where everyone is much nicer lol

Sorry. I did a whole post on how it annoyed me because he claimed unprovoked on day 1.