*also walks away still wishing charlie had agreed to let me bow out at f7 to save him from having to use his idol until f6... i hope now you see why i thought that would have made things a little more fair. lols and disapears.*

No, i just shoulnt have been so selfish ;)

I do love that other post though and feel the same. I was seriously considering voting David ftw but these actions by Shane made it unlikely. I'd feel like I'd be voting for both of them to win and yeah... no.

Loving that it's final 2 :D

Shane you are disgusting :-P
You are probably most hated person in this org games because why you joined anyway?
Pleas dont log in never because noone need you here.
Bye and enjoy your titul of looser.

Dat slider o_O

That was a rough one in Kalahari!

Yah that took like what... 6 hours to prepare the posts _-_ It's rough in any game though, it's a nightmare lol :p Good thing this is only 4x4 which might be a lot less time consuming.

Plus Kim might have a great chance since she's good with sliders.

Charlie Herschel @ 5/10/2013 10:12

Yah that took like what... 6 hours to prepare the posts _-_ It's rough in any game though, it's a nightmare lol :p Good thing this is only 4x4 which might be a lot less time consuming. Plus Kim might have a great chance since she's good with sliders.

omg it took you that long?!

oh actually i checked and no, I guess it was including the posting with 3 ppl and interchanging. I think 4x4 will take em at most 2.

I meant this one to be easier than that one. Kalahari had... a lot of things that were ultimately not very successful. Like remember when it took me a whole day to tally that one challenge? UGH.

I've learned a lot since then. And I'm saner. xD

i am going to make an almost automatically rejected suggestion to you, amanda and ted and ghandia...

i think the jury members should HAVE to ask a question to be able to vote. or post like a statement or something... basically, i don't think shane should be allowed to vote for a winner unless he shows up to do the jury proceedings, otherwise it is literally like allowing a quitter to partake in the jury vote... which when i had originally asked if i could bow out, i was not going to be allowed.

i am all for people, especially shane, voting for david... but... yeah, i personally take offense to how shane ended his game.

just saying... hope you consider it.

oh and once again...

I LOVE YOU BECKY!!!!!!!!!!!

Sierra Reed @ 6/10/2013 18:20

i am going to make an almost automatically rejected suggestion to you, amanda and ted and ghandia... i think the jury members should HAVE to ask a question to be able to vote. or post like a statement or something... basically, i don't think shane should be allowed to vote for a winner unless he shows up to do the jury proceedings, otherwise it is literally like allowing a quitter to partake in the jury vote... which when i had originally asked if i could bow out, i was not going to be allowed. i am all for people, especially shane, voting for david... but... yeah, i personally take offense to how shane ended his game. just saying... hope you consider it.

Not rejected! I think it really is a valid point. The fact is though, I think Shane will come back of David makes the finals, and will do his jury duty, and may just stay gone if David is not in the finals. He was clearly mad that this a Final 2. I mean it is one thing if like your on the jury, and you're going on a vacation somewhere and can't ask question, but this is more of a "rage quit" kind of situation. Me and Amanda will talk this over and come up with a ruling.

I have never once looked at a juror's bootlist to determine who they would vote for to win. Not ONCE. Shane left a bootlist and I'm not even giving it a second glance, because it's not like I'm going to use it unless he gets his ass on here and makes a legit parchment.

As for your point, I agree that a jury member should be required to address the final two in some capacity. Even if it's just a moronic spiel like:

Quote

Hai guyz. one ? y should i vote 4 u 2 win thats all.

Or something that stupid. I have no objections to something like that - as long as it isn't the last juror up to bring down the house epically in some shape or form (like Brenda did in Caramoan). It's something. On the real show, you can't get out of the FTC. And if you quit, you might not even be there (depends on what they rule - a Janu may get to keep a jury spot [quitting to save somebody else who wants to be there more], but a NaOnka would not [quitting to troll]).

Shane is more Janu than NaOnka, so I'm fine with keeping him on the jury as long as he shows up to the FTC. He just needs to show up in some capacity and allow the finalists to plead their cases to win... even if he makes a statement saying that he knows who he's voting to win, that counts.

...why do I suddenly expect Shane to copy-paste something from here? XD, no offense!

SIGH @ Katie not even attempting the challenge. Seriously this final 3.

It's easy to give off @ them but really like I'm not even bitter for being voted out, but this just bs, we all woulda liked a chance to compete.