Jamie: Why Bryce over 317 yesterday?

Mads @ 4/1/2018 21:49

Primate @ 4/1/2018 22:48 Why would you protect the scummy looking inactive? I was protecting the inactive, I was RBing the inactive. I was thinking scum might be likely to send one of the inactives out for the kill.

Forgive me if this was said already and I missed it, but....

1) Your Jailkeeper lets you choose to protect or roleblock, not both?
2) You only blocked Rose, not protected her?

Mads @ 4/1/2018 22:21

Helios Garabandia @ 4/1/2018 23:17 Mads @ 4/1/2018 21:49 Primate @ 4/1/2018 22:48 Why would you protect the scummy looking inactive? I was protecting the inactive, I was RBing the inactive. I was thinking scum might be likely to send one of the inactives out for the kill. Forgive me if this was said already and I missed it, but.... 1) Your Jailkeeper lets you choose to protect or roleblock, not both? 2) You only blocked Rose, not protected her? No it basically does both simultaneously. I prevent the person I jail from using their night action while also preventing them from being killed.

....but wait, what about what you said earlier?

Mads @ 4/1/2018 21:50

My role is really fucking hard because every night I have to decide whether to protect or whether to block.

Looking back at all the kills, trying to find a pattern.

Night 1
Brian (Kids Table)
Curtis (Sock)
Ahoda (In-Laws)

Night 2
Christian (bad hiding choice)
Ben (In-Laws)
Vlady (Sock)
Patrick (Kids Table)

Night 3
Zersch (Sock)
TIB (Kids Table)
Sock (In-Laws)

Night 4
Nav
Chris
Buffy

Night 5
Merc
Darkus

Night 6
Timmah
DS
Rose

I didn't add any "killer guesses" past the ones I had done before. So, what we know is that we've had a standard 3 kills each night, except for Night 5, when 317 was blocked. Up until D4, we had Kids Table, In-Laws, and SK Sock. We Lynched Sock, but we kept the three kills. We shouldn't have had two kills after lynching Sock, but we still did. So I'm thinking SKIT, not Vig.

What I'm saying here is ##Vote: im317, because the only logical thing is that he's responsible for the missing kill.

Also! In terms of scum, we've had the following:

In-Laws (3)
Lamps (Role Cop)
Nav (Lawyer)
TIB (Godmother)

Kids Table(3)
Curtis (Redirector)
Ahoda ('Nilla)
Ben (Info Peeker)

Other Scum (2)
Sock (SK)
Bryce (Survivor)

We haven't found the Kids Table GF, and (based on balance), the In-Laws should have a 'Nilla. I think that's not enough on each scumteam for balance sake (I'd have a minimum of 5 on each team), but FE hosts don't host like I do, so we could only be looking for those two. Plus, we need to find a SKIT.

Basically, I think we need to find 3 more scum at a minimum and 5 more scum more likely. What do you guys think?

Spin @ 4/1/2018 23:21

Someone remind me, didn't someone yesterday suggest that all of the in-law roles were "law and order" related? Wouldn't a jailer also fit into that theme?

That was Herm's 10th post in D6:

Quote

Kids table's got kid based roles and In-Laws have law based roles. So at the very least, I don't think Kids Table's got similar type of roles like Role Cop etc.

Tattooed Tooth @ 5/1/2018 9:16

J A M I E @ 5/1/2018 10:45 i missed rose being cleared of inlaw, when did that happen? On D3 she was the first one to point out that Christian was going to hide behind Lamps N2. But then, Nav found another hint to that, so she's not 100% clean after all.

At that point, neither one of them were suspected of being In-Law. Really, neither was Lamps at that point. It seems like an interesting play for both of them to throw Lamps under the bus at that point. So I'd actually be surprised if Rose flipped In-Law.

Have I ever told you guys how much I despise even days? Ugh.

Herm @ 5/1/2018 12:43

So if we are to believe every claim to be true, then most of the people unclaimed are scum, from the list of claims, im317/Spin/Maddie in that order for me for who seems scummiest. Herm: absolutely town TT: Christian hid behind him N1 Maddie: jailer Spin: miller/searcher Primate: messenger im317: bodyguard - Jamie: ??? Rose: ??? farlig: ??? PORL: ??? Helios: ???

By this logic, you put yourself in the Scum category, unless you've claimed and I just missed it.

I think three of the unclaimed people are unclaimed ass scum and two of the claimed people are lying ass scum.

Snowflake poker @ 5/1/2018 14:35

If rose isn't going to show up today after posting yesterday, I would not have a problem voting her but will give her more time. An im lynch on the other hand would help clear up the potential missing kill issue.

Rose posted yesterday? Where?

Sorry I've been out most this evening. My apartment building lost both heat AND hot water, and I'm about not freezing my ass off tonight.

Mads @ 5/1/2018 20:52

Why does it say Rose is voting for Rose? Is that a mistake?

Very intrigued by this.

Personally, I think both Rose and im317 are scum, so I'd be good either way.

Herm @ 5/1/2018 21:20

I'm neither, but the In-Laws can come at me tonight if they think they're up for the task.

...and the Kids Table?