First of all, good to know Lamps was scum AND in-law, so DS' claim makes sense.

Second of all, time to finish some pending lynches.
##lynch Sock

Snowflake poker @ 29/12/2017 0:59

This should produce a fun day especially after so many tried to push the vote away from Lamps yesterday.

Some might have been trying to push away indeed (going to check votals later), but what mostly happened was the presence of 2 good leads. :)

Herm @ 29/12/2017 0:58

RIP Zersch TIB scum too?

RIP ;_;

I'd say 10% chance of being Town BP, 20% chance of being either faction's Don...
And 1% chance of we having backup doctor/nurse/whatever protecting him last night.

On another note, too bad the roleblocker in this game is scum...
Hopefully DS' can bring us a good scan result.

I should have taken those statistics classes xD

Ok, I just wanted to say it's twice more likely for TiB being Don than BP, so we can say 33% BP, 66% Don and 1% any other crazy scenario. ;)

Sebta Claus @ 29/12/2017 1:50

So looking at kills again, in-light of Lamps' flip and assuming In-laws is a second mafia. As always qualifiers are to be assumed. I am not stating any of this as fact. N1 - 3 kills brian - In-law or Kids Cultis - Sock claimed this. Ahoda - Vig/SK If Sock is SK we seem to be missing a kill here. N2 - 4 kills Christian - Hid behind Lamps Ben - Vig or In-laws or Kids vlady - Sock claimed this Patrick - Vig or In-laws or Kids Again if Sock is SK we seem to be missing a kill again N3 - 3 kill/attempts Zersch - In-laws or kids. Hopefully Vig wasn't dumb enough to shoot Zersch here but it looks pretty clear that Vig shot Sock TiB - In-laws or kids. Sock - Vig Sock claims to have been blocked. So there were 3 kill attempts outside of Sock. Something doesn't add up here.

I'm thinking more than 1 person targeted Curtis night 1.
Then the actual Vig could simply have chosen not to kill anyone N2, or maybe some scum tried to kill Christian.

Spin, since we have 2 factions and we probably have 2 specific cops (if DS' role truly is in-cop law), I wonder if it makes any sense you be scanned as scum for both...
Simultaneously appearing as in-law and kids' table, that's very weird >.>

Helios Garabandia @ 29/12/2017 21:48

im317 @ 29/12/2017 18:16 Helios Garabandia @ 29/12/2017 17:34 Spin @ 29/12/2017 14:54 With 2 mafias, we shouldn't just "policy lynch" or "deal with" or waste a day lynching a town number. We shouldn't just "policy lynch" anyone. At any time. For any reason. Shit Town is still Town, after all. its not the player so much as the role. its the easiest and one of the most common fake claims by scum. i don't advocate lynching it over other better reads, but if we have a day when there are no good leads then i feel its a better lynch then say defaulting to an inactive. When I hear policy Lynch, I'm always interpreting that as fuck this guy he needs to get die. And you know that's a thing that I am not a fan of. I'll never be a fan of that.

*ahem*MCP*ahem
:P

DsssssssS @ 29/12/2017 22:32

Chinese Fire Drill Everyone jumps on a secondary lynch target quickly and brings them to near lynch to see how players react, with the intention of reverting back to the original lynch target before deadline or hammer cdcmafia.wikia.com/wiki/Mafia_Terminology

We kind of did that during D3...

Mads @ 29/12/2017 23:02

Yesterday was mainly just focused on Lamps being caught scum but claiming PGO and then Buffy outing info saying she saw Sock visit vlady (who died). That's basically all you missed yesterday.

And all the votes and reactions that, if read, are core to a Mafia Game.