I am 1 time BP vig and I was RBd last night.

I targeted Chris last night because the Ouija board of f-words told me to. It benefits town of it goes through. Obviously

Tattooed Tooth @ 29/12/2017 3:16

Ok, I just wanted to say it's twice more likely for TiB being Don than BP, so we can say 33% BP, 66% Don and 1% any other crazy scenario. ;)

33% SK, 33% Don, 33% BP, 1% other

Mads @ 29/12/2017 3:30

But if Buffy thinks I’m scum then I’m most definitely town.

same same

Buffy @ 29/12/2017 3:38

Sock, what was your block message from Zashua?

I was told my aciton was unsuccessful. assumed I was blocked

Townie questioning townie to get to the truth. Brian bless us, everyone.

Stocking @ 29/12/2017 3:47

Buffy @ 29/12/2017 3:38 Sock, what was your block message from Zashua? I was told my aciton was unsuccessful. assumed I was blocked Townie questioning townie to get to the truth. Brian bless us, everyone.

oh, flavorwise. I wss told I got distracted

Art imitates life

I request that I am roleblocked again tonight so someone(anyone) can clear me of wrongdoing and we can go back to killing scum

Helios Garabandia @ 29/12/2017 3:59

Sebta Claus @ 28/12/2017 22:50 So looking at kills again, in-light of Lamps' flip and assuming In-laws is a second mafia. As always qualifiers are to be assumed. I am not stating any of this as fact. N1 - 3 kills brian - In-law or Kids Cultis - Sock claimed this. Ahoda - Vig/SK If Sock is SK we seem to be missing a kill here. N2 - 4 kills Christian - Hid behind Lamps Ben - Vig or In-laws or Kids vlady - Sock claimed this Patrick - Vig or In-laws or Kids Again if Sock is SK we seem to be missing a kill again N3 - 3 kill/attempts Zersch - In-laws or kids. Hopefully Vig wasn't dumb enough to shoot Zersch here but it looks pretty clear that Vig shot Sock TiB - In-laws or kids. Sock - Vig Sock claims to have been blocked. So there were 3 kill attempts outside of Sock. Something doesn't add up here. A. Sock is actually a one-shot BP vig B. Sock is a member of one of the scumteams (maybe the In Laws' equivalent of 'Nilla Maf Ahoda?) C. Sock is SK, and one of the scumteams targeted him N3 for Town cred D. Sock is SK, and there is no Vig

may the odds be ever in my favor

Primate @ 29/12/2017 3:59

Also, where the hell do they sell egg nog in bottles?

at the liquor store...as soon as they decided they could pre-package eggnog with booze.

Primate @ 29/12/2017 4:04

Sockie, Why didn't you mention the bp thing yesterday? Who are your top scum reads?

The BP toss-in would have for sure had me lynched yesterday, or worse, not attacked by scum last night phase. leaving one more of my fellow townies alive to pursue the victory we all hope to achieve

Primate @ 29/12/2017 4:04

Sockie, Why didn't you mention the bp thing yesterday? Who are your top scum reads?

Top scum reads: Chris, Porl, Garlic

Timmah @ 29/12/2017 4:13

Why exactly are we believing caught scum saying they were blocked?

yeah Buffy, why should we believe you?

Stocking @ 29/12/2017 4:14

Timmah @ 29/12/2017 4:13 Why exactly are we believing caught scum saying they were blocked? yeah Buffy, why should we believe you?

WAIT, ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ME TIMMAH AS THOUGH I'M NOT EVEN HERE

Helios Garabandia @ 29/12/2017 4:17

Sebta Claus @ 28/12/2017 23:02 Helios Garabandia @ 28/12/2017 19:59 Sebta Claus @ 28/12/2017 22:50 So looking at kills again, in-light of Lamps' flip and assuming In-laws is a second mafia. As always qualifiers are to be assumed. I am not stating any of this as fact. N1 - 3 kills brian - In-law or Kids Cultis - Sock claimed this. Ahoda - Vig/SK If Sock is SK we seem to be missing a kill here. N2 - 4 kills Christian - Hid behind Lamps Ben - Vig or In-laws or Kids vlady - Sock claimed this Patrick - Vig or In-laws or Kids Again if Sock is SK we seem to be missing a kill again N3 - 3 kill/attempts Zersch - In-laws or kids. Hopefully Vig wasn't dumb enough to shoot Zersch here but it looks pretty clear that Vig shot Sock TiB - In-laws or kids. Sock - Vig Sock claims to have been blocked. So there were 3 kill attempts outside of Sock. Something doesn't add up here. A. Sock is actually a one-shot BP vig B. Sock is a member of one of the scumteams (maybe the In Laws' equivalent of 'Nilla Maf Ahoda?) C. Sock is SK, and one of the scumteams targeted him N3 for Town cred D. Sock is SK, and there is no Vig I feel like in a game which seems to have 2 Mafia teams, Town would have a Vig too for balance. Fair point. So, if we assume there IS a vig, then we're missing a kill N1 and N3 (or the same person was targeted more than once in both N1 and N3)?

Who claims blocked n2?

also, just because I'm being silly, doesn't mean I'm not serious. I have a hard time not poking fun at an imaginary murder game with friends that know what my hed looks like