Herm @ 6/1/2017 20:49

ahoda @ 7/1/2017 3:42 I was attached last night. Screw you! Serious topic, but this reads funny.

And the auto correct wins again.

So anyone besides ahoda "attached" last night?

Vic @ 6/1/2017 21:13

farlig @ 6/1/2017 21:10 So anyone besides ahoda "attached" last night? People can very well lie about being attacked

They can. But those doing the attacking, since town can, can see if the person they attacked fesses up or not.

Yes I know. But lying is always a risk for scum. You aren't telling me anything new.

Timmah always seems a little off when he's scum.

Lamps started last game like this so hard to say he's scum for his lack of good posts. Plus with 30+ people it's harder to make those initial reads.

I'm starting to think I need to pick a new "lamps" to troll. Anyone want dibs?

As for the game, surely there was at least one scum on either the lynch train or trying to claim an item. Have all people that received an item checked in?

Herm @ 7/1/2017 11:29

I'll try to protect you from that this game. TIB hasn't said much considering he got an item yesterday.

Last page only nick hadn't showed up, just sayin' (:

DB claiming Mario is risky if in fact he wasn't Mario. We knew all characters were in play so those implying it was a safe claim for other reasons give me pause.

We smashed helios because he asked for it. Same reason for Zersch.

Who were the ones that wanted to lynch DB because of his claim and not because he's from FFA?

I am not debating the fact that character probably has any correlation with alignment. However, those that tried to use it either way (pro-town or anti-town) would be worth looking at.

im317 @ 7/1/2017 13:56

Vic @ 7/1/2017 13:54 Malion 🏴 @ 7/1/2017 13:51 Vic @ 7/1/2017 14:46 Something else to consider. The rules say that if someone doesn't use their Final Smash and is attacked, then the attacker will steal the smash. So I feel like this makes it a lot more likely that the person with the final smash could get attacked with the hopes that the attacker steals it as well. This means that whoever has a final smash is probably very likely to use it the night they have it. Wouldn't this be an added incentive for Helios to have been attacked last night he Mafia trying to steal his smash? I think it's the opposite. Because the ball is stolen if you don't use it and are hit the people going for it probably want to use it right away. I think if you use and are hit you use it first so mafia wouldn't want to focus on. Those people because it's already too late. Maybe if an inactive person had the smash ball or didn't actively ask for it they might be more willing to attack but there is no way someone asking for it will sit on it. Right, but my main point is why wouldn't Mafia attack the person in hopes of somehow stealing it? It makes them stronger as a unit if they successfully steal. Basically I just don't want to assume Helios is cleared and am thinking out loud. as long as we are talking about stealing, the rules say that if you have an unused item when you get KOed the person who kills you gets that item.

Except the final smash ability:

When a player receives a final smash, they MAY choose to wait to use it. However, doing so comes at a significant risk. If the player takes any damage that night, and did not use the Final Smash, their first attacker will steal it

Because scum would never put out a PT idea to buy town credit :)

BadgerMcBeaver @ 7/1/2017 14:46

farlig @ 7/1/2017 14:41 Because scum would never put out a PT idea to buy town credit :) Is this me you are responding to?

Affirmative.

Not knowing has it's benefits unless we use that information to help give the turkey to since it supposedly rebuilds health.