Whoever is going around killing these people at night are perpetrating hate crimes against internet citizens. I'd petition my local lawmakers to put a stop to these mafia scum and vigilantes, but I know they won't do anything about it so I guess I'll just write about it on my Tumblr.

##Lynch Badger

I don't remember seeing him post all day yesterday? if he's here then speak up, maybe I just missed it.

##Unlynch Badger

You're off the hook this time, but one more bigoted comment from you and I'll go right back to lynching you. Stating that you "didn't THINK about the game at all" is a microaggression against those who are legally brain-dead or comatose.

Check ur privilege.

If people were wondering why Lamps lynched me, it's because I posted a long-ass explanation for why his actions and claim was utter bullshit. And if you noticed, I only "flip-flopped" on his lynch when I immediately unlynched after he claimed, (to think through his claim), but if you go back I posted another long-ass writeup for why his claim was bullshit BEFORE Angie counterclaimed and relynched. I can go back and find the post if you want. Sure, it could be a master plan to distance myself from scum Godfather... or I could have been using common sense and been one of the only ones who didn't believe the claim for a second. Look at Occam's Razor and decide henty's.

I honestly don't have a preference on who to lynch today, preferably someone who isn't really contributing as much. That's why I started off by lynching Badger, and when he showed up I unlynched.

henty's is a gay boy term used in my local drag club

Occam's Razor is the theory that between two options, the simplest one is usually the correct one. So either Lamps and I devised a plan to distance myself from him by having me type up write-up's on why his actions were questionable and having him lynch me, or I simply didn't believe his claims and he got frustrated with me being so adamant that he should be the lynch. I think the latter is the more likely option, because if I was scum I wouldn't go through that much to put attention on myself just to distance myself from somebody who was obviously going to die soon and flip as Godfather when I could have instead just been under-the-radar.

The protecting yourself night 1 thing was part of my point, my main point when I relynched before Angi counter-claimed was that if Lamps was actually JOAT, he would have claimed immediately because a JOAT claim is provable. I didn't see the point in protecting yourself night 1 and then rolling over to die the next day. As soon as he claimed JOAT a bunch of people hopped off his train, case in point. Why did it take him almost 24 hours? It legitimately didn't make sense to me and I'm still confused why so many people needed Angi to counter-claim to see that.

Curtis @ 30/4/2016 12:56

Bryce why Badger over Wikey?

Is Wikey inactive too? I'm down to lynch him if he is. I went to the players list and looked down the list, noticed Badger's name and remember noticing his absence because Tom is basically my favorite person ever and I usually notice when he posts. It was just to get the ball rolling, I really didn't have a specific preference.

What is people's reasoning for lynching Wikey?

What's the lynch count? What concerns me is that we have a bunch of low numbered lynch vote counts, (Herm, Wikey, Me), and that it's easy for scum to push in a certain direction with a split like this. If we don't have a ton of information, I feel more comfortable voting for a less-active person.

Luckily I just checked the deadline and apparently we have until tomorrow morning? (noon EST)

Herm @ 30/4/2016 17:14

Bryce, who are your top suspicions and why?

We don't have TOO much to look into, just mainly people's reactions to the Lamps lynch. So all my reads are VERY tentative.

Looking back on Day 2, Ahoda mentioned early on that "I don't see how Lamps is scum because there is no way SK or Mafia attacked JC"

When Lamps came in he said that JC was a likely Vig or SK kill, not a scum kill.

Curtis then hopped on board by saying he agreed with Ahoda that Lamps was a more likely scum kill attempt and that JC was a vig kill.

Dadd then hopped on board the train to lynch Eben over Lamps, and mentioned that JC was a likely Vig kill

Redster hopped on board the Eben lynch over Lamps, saying he agreed with Ahoda/Curtis/Dadd, and calling Me/Eben/Merc out for being so deadset against Lamps from the start.

Timmah made a good point on page 7 that usually in most games, when someone survives an attack, 90% of the time they're scum and most people are on board with lynching that person, but in this game like four people started defending Lamps hardcore.

Herm looks good by consistently pushing Lamps to claim.

Ahoda jumped back in after Timmah to state again that he didn't think scum would ever kill JC night 1

Dadd then hopped in to agree, speculated about whether it was a Vig or an SK, mentioned that he could see a SK killing JC

Then an argument happened between Vlady vs Ahoda/Dadd with Vlady being pretty adamant that Lamps was obvi mafia and Ahoda/Dadd defending Lamps.

(note that at this point Dadd had a lynch vote on Lamps tho)

Rose came across kind of scummy on page 9 by hopping in and kind of weighing both sides without making a final call.

---- okay so that's only the first ten pages, I can get caught up on the rest tomorrow, but even those first ten pages told me quit a bit ----

My biggest reads for scum are Curtis/Ahoda/Dadd/Redster, they were the one's who were primarily pushing that "JC was NOT killed by scum" narrative earlier on. However, would scum really be that stupid to go so gung-ho defending their godfather who survived a night attack and didn't even had a claim ready?

My biggest reads for town are Angi, Timmah, herm, Eben, Vlady

*prepares for onslaught of backlash*

THIS IS ALL BASED OFF OF THE FIRST TEN PAGES OF DAY 2. I don't feel confident enough in any of my reads yet to legitimately go after someone based off of the fact that they had a wrong read, because lord knows I'm guilty of that, (remember when I almost flipped the vote to lynch an inactive town vanilla over the mafia godfather in ATTWS when I was town? I can't criticize anyone for being wrong on a read). Which is why I lean towards lynching a less active player this time around.

Herm @ 30/4/2016 18:22

Per your observations, scum probably didn't push Lamps for a claim but were probably more likely to just lynch him.

This is a good insight. I did want to point out who was pushing the "JC couldn't have been killed by scum" narrative though, because I didn't think that argument made much sense. I think a majority of scum didn't really push too hard for a Lamps claim or lynch, but didn't defend him too much either. I think it's worth it to make note of who WAS defending him though, although I agree it's not enough to lynch someone for without any more evidence.

I don't think Herm is a good lynch choice.

Why are people lynching Wikey again? I don't remember seeing him post so I'm going to go ahead and ##Lynch Wikey because as I've stated a few different times, I'm leaning towards a more less-active lynch for today since it's pretty slow-moving without a ton of information.

I'm always down for a Chris lynch if we're lacking information, when Wikey does show up he's good, I don't know why he hasn't been around but like people are saying, it's the weekend. I'd rather lynch someone who has the opportunity to be here but isn't contributing.

Still don't see the logic behind a Herm lynch, but maybe that's because I ramble just as much.

^ That came out of actual nowhere