What's a GLBer?

Zersch @ 6/4/2017 22:39

Oh yeah that glitch shit was weird. N64 was p. boss in its day, it wouldn't be afraid of a little action and glitch out.

The glitch thing left me unsure of the flip.

Curtis @ 6/4/2017 22:45

I assumed Janitor

But doesn't Jan just delay the flip?

Timmah @ 6/4/2017 22:49

Nofo @ 6/4/2017 21:46 jamie ♂ @ 6/4/2017 22:44 Wikey's unlockable active is neat, im curious as to how one unlocks theirs if they have one I would also like to know how unlockable abilities are unlocked Was just thinking this as well.

I assume by using your ability a number of times, or successfully?

Or archaically could mean unable to be locked. But I agree with Nofo and Primate.

Primate @ 6/4/2017 23:00

Curtis @ 6/4/2017 20:59 Primate @ 6/4/2017 21:53 Timmah @ 6/4/2017 20:49 Nofo @ 6/4/2017 21:46 jamie ♂ @ 6/4/2017 22:44 Wikey's unlockable active is neat, im curious as to how one unlocks theirs if they have one I would also like to know how unlockable abilities are unlocked Was just thinking this as well. My role has parts that get unlocked whenever scum dies. Mafia just set their sights on you I always wonder why people do this I hope so.

As long as this is out there, are you able to share if you know this because part of your role unlocked?

Sock @ 6/4/2017 23:07

Herm @ 7/4/2017 3:04 Maybe Mittens's role was locked? BUT WAS IT UNLOCKABLE

Mustn't something be locked before it can be unlocked?

Primate @ 6/4/2017 23:12

Herm @ 6/4/2017 21:12 You guys are probably right about a Day Janitor thing, but the fact it said he was Town made me think it was part of his role. That could be too.

Like "you are X but when you flip it will say TOWN"?

Is cult the same as scum, or is scum exclusively mafia? Primate never really answered if scum has died, but it's a moot point if my understanding of "scum" is too narrow.

Primate @ 6/4/2017 23:28

CherryBerry @ 6/4/2017 21:26 Is cult the same as scum, or is scum exclusively mafia? Primate never really answered if scum has died, but it's a moot point if my understanding of "scum" is too narrow. Scum is anyone which isn't town for the purpose of my earlier post.

Okay, thank you. Sorry I'm slow.

Miko, what's the number one lead we should follow up on from yesterday?

Christian @ 6/4/2017 23:42

Jack @ 6/4/2017 22:38 Christian @ 6/4/2017 23:27 Was the glitch someone's day action? Based on the opening flavour, that's what it looked like. All we know is that Mittens was Town? Christian, are you scum? No, why do you ask? :P I was back on page 3 when I asked that question. The flavour said Mittens died from fright. That's definitely someone else's role in play. So I think his role was hidden due another player, not his own role.

I don't follow the logical leap. The flavor only implies this. It never explicitly states it was fright that killed him. I only took it to be flavor. You really feel from this we know that's an effect of someone's role?

Christian @ 6/4/2017 23:54

CherryBerry @ 6/4/2017 22:49 Christian @ 6/4/2017 23:42 Jack @ 6/4/2017 22:38 Christian @ 6/4/2017 23:27 Was the glitch someone's day action? Based on the opening flavour, that's what it looked like. All we know is that Mittens was Town? Christian, are you scum? No, why do you ask? :P I was back on page 3 when I asked that question. The flavour said Mittens died from fright. That's definitely someone else's role in play. So I think his role was hidden due another player, not his own role. I don't follow the logical leap. The flavor only implies this. It never explicitly states it was fright that killed him. I only took it to be flavor. You really feel from this we know that's an effect of someone's role? Yeah, well maybe I shouldn't be reading into the flavour, but those are just my thoughts. I also shouldn't have used the word 'definitely'. But I still think someone else hid his role.

That last point is how I'm leaning as well.

Miko @ 7/4/2017 0:06

CherryBerry @ 7/4/2017 3:40 Miko, what's the number one lead we should follow up on from yesterday? Possibly the instigators for the Mittens lynch considering he was town - but even then, the glitch kind of complicated things so that option can't be much trusted either and we have a good hook on Timmah which I believe we shouldn't release atm. So I honestly won't put a name out as I have no clear motive and I don't want to come off as suspicious by putting out a name with a half-assed reasoning, as I did that last round with intentions to not seem like a lurker or a follower as I had nothing else to contribute at that point but didn't want to be silent and be seen as suspicious like that, but in the process I only got a target on my back. It rightfully came across as ridiculous and suspicious. So unless I have a full valid reasoning with no contradictions, I won't be throwing names out anymore. What about you Cherry? Any leads you believe we should follow up on?

Curtis was the one pushing hardest for it, but I think the logic was sound. I'm still not convinced Mittens was town.

Wikey jumping around was suspicious to me, but it's obvious now that he was town. Others voiced suspicion of it yesterday, so he doesn't seem like the ideal mafia target, which is consistent with the discussion we've had around Timmah today, leaving Wikey as some sort of SK/Vig target.

To be honest, I still don't know what to make of you yet, which is why I asked.

I reread Ahoda's posts from yesterday, and without knowing him outside this game, don't know how we would think he might try to recruit Angi or Maddie. On votes alone, he seemed to suspect Farlig and im317, so those seem unlikely targets of his last night. He also commented on how quickly people piled on Curtis, and then fleed as quickly. Would Curtis be someone he'd visit?