|
|
primate
Eff Ewe DADD!
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 24,154 | Joined: | Feb 21, 2015 |
| Post #1: 13th Jan 2018 6:41 PM | |
I would pick the first one. I don't trust the government enough to allow them to be the only ones who can own guns.
Plus, gun laws have proven ineffective in keeping guns out of the hands of criminals.
Post Edited by primate @ 13th Jan 2018 6:43 PM | |
| | |
primate
Eff Ewe DADD!
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 24,154 | Joined: | Feb 21, 2015 |
| Post #2: 13th Jan 2018 9:26 PM | |
Gun alarmists are cute. Most of them readily admit the foolishness of prohibition in any other matter.
I guess this is a special never gonna happen scenario, so I guess I would be ok with them being illegal with the caveat that I would still own them. | |
| | |
primate
Eff Ewe DADD!
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 24,154 | Joined: | Feb 21, 2015 |
| Post #3: 13th Jan 2018 9:28 PM | |
|
knifes, home security systems, dogs, kevin maccallister, window bars, police.... I mean its not gonna be a free for all just because most people won't have guns |
|
a larger number of bad people are going to have guns if you're legally required to have them. Including mentally unstable people who would have been fine if they weren't in the vicinity of a gun |
You do realize it's illegal for those folks to own guns now, right? | |
| | |
primate
Eff Ewe DADD!
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 24,154 | Joined: | Feb 21, 2015 |
| Post #4: 13th Jan 2018 9:29 PM | |
Did rose really just suggest bringing a knife to a gunfight? | |
| | |
6 Users Viewing (6 Guests) |
|
|