I voted Farlig because he was the lowest poster after rose showed up. When he came back, and it was down to him and Free Candy, I stayed with Farlig, because it didn't seem like he cared, which I took as being scum-leaning. Turns out I was wrong, and we lynched the wrong person.

## Lynch Free Candy

People defending Free Candy right now are susaf in my mind. He's scum. You can take that one to Vince McMahon's bank all day.

Spin @ 8/11/2017 20:30

People defending Free Candy right now are susaf in my mind. He's scum. You can take that one to Vince McMahon's bank all day.

Forgot to add:

Mittens @ 8/11/2017 20:32

Ok spin I’ll bite. ##lynch free candy

Don't you dare bite me.

The previous 15-20 posts are a perfect example of what we call a "flip-flop", as everybody who just made a strong point in support of Free Candy, just did a 180 and are trying to walk back their statements.

JJ, Timmah, DS, and Mittens...I see you.

JJ @ 8/11/2017 20:42

Spin @ 8/11/2017 22:40 The previous 15-20 posts are a perfect example of what we call a "flip-flop", as everybody who just made a strong point in support of Free Candy, just did a 180 and are trying to walk back their statements. JJ, Timmah, DS, and Mittens...I see you. You made a post intimating you have info on FC. Why are you sketching about people who believe you?

I made a post intimating I have info on FC.

People came out (you included) saying FC isn't scum because of how the day played out, and those that think so are sus.

I made another post intimating again I have info.

Everyone turns around and boards the train.

JJ @ 8/11/2017 20:48

I don't think I said FC isn't scum, I said it wasn't proof of anything in a D1 vote. And in itself it is not. You seemed to have info so I'm trusting that unless you're just hosing us?

If FC is scum, then the whole "Day 1 voting doesn't mean anything" argument looks susaf. Because, in that case, scum was almost lynched, and people like Vlady, rose, and Timmah joined late. They'd be people I'd look more closely at going forward.

Timmah @ 8/11/2017 20:49

Feels like we are twisting words here. I never said that people are sus for thinking FC isnscum for how the day played out. What i said was that people making up an alternate set of facts in order to push that belief that FC is scum looked bad. There’s quite the large bit of difference in the 2, especially for someone who has no idea what FC’s alignment is.

Of course you don't want anyone looking at the D1 vote...you were the hammer.

JJ @ 8/11/2017 20:53

LOOK AT ME SPIN!

You're flailing around in a trash bag...how can I not look at you?

Dwayne JohnSeb @ 8/11/2017 20:55

Spin, DO you have info or nah.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Timmah @ 8/11/2017 21:00

Timmah @ 8/11/2017 21:57 Spin @ 8/11/2017 21:52 Timmah @ 8/11/2017 20:49 Feels like we are twisting words here. I never said that people are sus for thinking FC isnscum for how the day played out. What i said was that people making up an alternate set of facts in order to push that belief that FC is scum looked bad. There’s quite the large bit of difference in the 2, especially for someone who has no idea what FC’s alignment is. Of course you don't want anyone looking at the D1 vote...you were the hammer. Ive never once stated that D1 lynch shouldn’t be looked at. Perhaps go back and read my actual posts? Also, when I voted farlig he was already in the lead. I don’t call that “the hammer”, though perhaps you do. Semantics, but I don’t want The actual facts twisted, which is what Ive been saying all along.

You were the deciding vote. If you want to call that something else, so be it. He's dead from your vote.

Mads @ 8/11/2017 21:02

Wait which football club are we lynching? No one has specified.

ousux

Timing of D1 Votes (on Farlig and FC) -- All times CT
Votes for Farlig in purple. Votes for Free Candy in orange

Ahoda -- 5:00 pm (11/6) ==> Farlig up 1-0
Savage -- 5:43 am ==> Tied vote (1-1)
Curtis -- 3:44 pm ==> Farlig up 2-1
JJ -- 3:46 pm ==> Tied vote (2-2)
Spin -- 4:01 pm ==> Farlig up 3-2
DS -- 4:10 pm ==> Tied vote (3-3)
Free Candy -- 4:14 pm ==> Farlig up (4-3)
Vlady -- 4:14 pm ==> Farlig up (5-3)
drrr -- 4:16 pm ==> Farlig up (6-3)
drrr unvote -- 4:17 pm ==> Farlig up (5-3)
??? -- sometime between 4:16 and 4:21 pm ==> Farlig up (5-4)
drrr -- 5:19 pm ==> Farlig up (6-4)
Chris -- 5:40 pm ==> Farlig up (6-5)
Timmah -- 6:54 pm ==> Farlig up (7-5)
Navneet -- 6:55 pm ==> Farlig up (7-6)

Day ends 5 minutes later.

Timmah @ 8/11/2017 21:06

So, riddle me this. If 10 people vote person X 5 hours into the 24 hour day phase. Then suddenly with 10 minutes left in the day, someone says they have proof person Y is scum. 9 people jump on, but person X is still lynched. Is the 10th person that voted person X all those hours ago still the reason person X was lynched over person Y? I mean, they are still the deciding vote. Point being that it’s not black and white like you’re painting it professor.

When you voted Farlig, the vote was 6-5 with 6 minutes left in the day phase, and no vote had been cast for either person in the last hour. If you had delayed hitting enter for even 30 seconds, Nav would have tied it up, and you'd have been the hammer.

That's pretty black and white (or purple and orange, if you look at my previous post).

Patrick @ 8/11/2017 21:20

Spin @ 8/11/2017 22:18 Timing of D1 Votes (on Farlig and FC) -- All times CT Votes for Farlig in purple. Votes for Free Candy in orange Ahoda -- 5:00 pm (11/6) ==> Farlig up 1-0 Savage -- 5:43 am ==> Tied vote (1-1) Curtis -- 3:44 pm ==> Farlig up 2-1 JJ -- 3:46 pm ==> Tied vote (2-2) Spin -- 4:01 pm ==> Farlig up 3-2 DS -- 4:10 pm ==> Tied vote (3-3) Free Candy -- 4:14 pm ==> Farlig up (4-3) Vlady -- 4:14 pm ==> Farlig up (5-3) drrr -- 4:16 pm ==> Farlig up (6-3) drrr unvote -- 4:17 pm ==> Farlig up (5-3) ??? -- sometime between 4:16 and 4:21 pm ==> Farlig up (5-4) drrr -- 5:19 pm ==> Farlig up (6-4) Chris -- 5:40 pm ==> Farlig up (6-5) Timmah -- 6:54 pm ==> Farlig up (7-5) Navneet -- 6:55 pm ==> Farlig up (7-6) Day ends 5 minutes later. is this legit? I would have bet money that FC was leading at one point later in the day.