|
BadgerMcBeaver
Plex
| Reputation: 103 | Group: | Elite | Posts: | 3,168 | Joined: | Nov 30, 2014 |
| Post #1: 20th Jun 2015 9:16 PM | |
We haven't had any confirmation of that but I think we should be assuming that the Chaotic Mafia does exist. We lose nothing really by assuming that they do exist but we might end up missing potential slip ups if we arrive at the conclusion that they don't. It's pretty troubling considering we haven't managed to lynch one of them successfully yet and numbers are beginning to dwindle. | |
| | |
BadgerMcBeaver
Plex
| Reputation: 103 | Group: | Elite | Posts: | 3,168 | Joined: | Nov 30, 2014 |
| Post #2: 20th Jun 2015 9:39 PM | |
Was your dream the same as the one that Moose got earlier on in the game? | |
| | |
BadgerMcBeaver
Plex
| Reputation: 103 | Group: | Elite | Posts: | 3,168 | Joined: | Nov 30, 2014 |
| Post #3: 20th Jun 2015 9:49 PM | |
She said had a dream that she could trust Sami. She didn't elaborate about it much more than stating that except to say that she wasn't sure how much she should trust it and to ask Sami if it was part of her role (looking back we didn't get a direct answer from Sami on that). | |
| | |
BadgerMcBeaver
Plex
| Reputation: 103 | Group: | Elite | Posts: | 3,168 | Joined: | Nov 30, 2014 |
| Post #4: 20th Jun 2015 10:24 PM | |
|
Just thinking about the timing...did Buffy get a pep talk that said not to trust Cake right before Cake was silenced? I got mine right after Boc is claiming to have been silenced. |
While we're on the subject of timing, both nights where a pep talk about who shouldn't be trusted occurred there was also a dream about who should be trusted that occurred. Maybe they are coming from the same person? | |
| | |
BadgerMcBeaver
Plex
| Reputation: 103 | Group: | Elite | Posts: | 3,168 | Joined: | Nov 30, 2014 |
| Post #5: 21st Jun 2015 11:19 AM | |
I do agree that there is a lot of stuff that Walk has done that has made me raise an eyebrow and I am not exactly opposed to lynching her right now but the one reason I'm not yet totally sold on Walk being scum is that she has so exclusively been targeting Cake. It doesn't feel like something scum would do because if Cake either dies or is lynched and flips town then Walk would be seen as the ringleader of that push and would be in some serious hot water. I don't think a mafia member would be so short sighted to make that their strategy from day 2 onward. Her rationale for targeting Cake has felt very forced but that could potentially be explained by having some form of intel and not wanting to express it and give her role away (but if that is the case Walk, I would say that now would be a good time to do so). | |
| | |
BadgerMcBeaver
Plex
| Reputation: 103 | Group: | Elite | Posts: | 3,168 | Joined: | Nov 30, 2014 |
| Post #6: 21st Jun 2015 11:34 AM | |
|
|
|
|
|
Oh and also, usually you only get a PM saying you've been blocked if you tried sending in an action Cake. So you're lying. |
This is what I said earlier. One of you is lying about the roleblocked message.
|
Considering the fact that I said I didn't send in an action first and that was the day Cake got apparently silent, yeah.
Why would anyone get a PM from the host saying they are blocked if they didnt send in an action? What kind of retard logic is that? |
I don't know. lol But that's where we are now. One of you is lying. I suppose Cake could be so desperate to get you lynched, but how come she's never voted to lynch you herself?
Cake, why have you never voted to lynch Walk?
|
I have in other days. |
Which day are you referring to? I just quickly scanned the lynch votes and the only one that Walk has received until today was from Herm on day 3. I only looked at the end of the day tally though, so if you lynched then unlynched her I wouldn't have noticed. | |
| | |
BadgerMcBeaver
Plex
| Reputation: 103 | Group: | Elite | Posts: | 3,168 | Joined: | Nov 30, 2014 |
| Post #7: 21st Jun 2015 6:43 PM | |
Out with the father for dinner right now. When I get back I'll catch up and post thoughts. Shouldn't be long. | |
| | |
BadgerMcBeaver
Plex
| Reputation: 103 | Group: | Elite | Posts: | 3,168 | Joined: | Nov 30, 2014 |
| Post #8: 21st Jun 2015 8:29 PM | |
I've been pretty convinced for most of today that the scum is trying to capitalize off of the Cake/Walk animosity. I think its very possible that Walk is scum of some kind but even if that's the case I think there are scum who are managing to slide under the radar because of that shit. After reading this day's thread the whole way through what stuck out to me is that Ahoda has acted really strange and I am not comfortable with it:
- He starts out by placing a lynch vote on Cake. He says that it doesn't sit well that she tried to get the lynch vote off Angi. Fair enough I thought that yesterday too. (Page 5)
- After that, the Cake/Walk fight is happening and Walk states that only people who submitted an action would know if they had been blocked (in response to Cake saying she had received info that she had been blocked without sending an action). From what I can tell, Cherry tries to see if anyone else had a similar experience to Cake in order to verify whether or not there is any likelihood that Cake is telling the truth. To which Ahoda implies that she is fishing for information and throws shade on Cherry (Page 7/8).
- Then he takes his vote off Cake because he believes the mafia is messing with her, which makes sense. Cake reads town to me and given the fact that she is receiving conflicting messages then I think the mafia is legit messing with her for some reason (page 9). About 10 mins later she declares she would like to vote for Teebs and then shortly after she actually does it (also page 9).
- A few hours after this, Buffy calls out Cake in a pretty personal way (Page 10). Here is where things get strange. Nothing has happened to indicate Cake has changed her mind whatsoever but then Ahoda asks why Cake has backed off on the Teebs (she currently has a lynch vote sent on him and has asked other people to do the same - Page 11). This makes her look bad at a time where she is potentially flustered with responding to Buffy's post. Cake has been a little all over the place at times but one thing she has been completely consistent on is wanting Teebs for days. He then signs on to vote Colby and is the second person to do so.
- Then he abruptly chimes in that he thinks Cherry is scum without providing an argument. When she pushes back and mentions that he's basing it off nothing, he tells her its just a theory and that she shouldn't get defensive. Wouldn't almost get defensive when there is a claim that is being made without any sort of argument attached? (Page 13)
- Now, after having voted to lynch Colby early on he is expressing doubts about the Colby plan and that it looks like a set up. It allows him to place a lynch vote on Colby but he leaves open an escape route from the blame associated with lynching a town member if Colby flips town (page 16).
I can't be the only one who thinks this is some very scummy behavior. It looks like he is capitalizing off Cherry turning up on Cake's list in addition to there being an anti-colby sentiment. His claims makes Cake and Cherry both look bad, and frankly both of them are reading town for me. This whole thing isn't sitting right. He also went out of his way to claim he is town twice today.
I might be ok to cast my vote for Colby because his accusations towards Buffy last night made very little sense to me and I don't want to derail thing. But this whole chain of events seems scummy to me. Do other people see this the same way? | |
| | |
11 Users Viewing (11 Guests) |
|
|