I agree that Walk looks suspicious. My suspicion of Alsark has picked up again.

Christian @ 14/6/2015 23:00

There's probably at least one (or two) Innocent Children running around since Rob's role mentioned any children visiting him would be too afraid to. And someone mentioned the Arsonist in connection to Schrauben, which might have been the reason he was killed?

I'm pretty sure he died due to his role. I need to look back. I'll correct myself if that's not the case.

Christian @ 14/6/2015 23:03

Dylan @ 14/6/2015 21:57 Yo guys, big Dyl here. Has everyone posted that didn't in phase 1? The only thing from day 1 that concerned me was Christian. He seemed scummy about his criticism on (moose I think) about being suspicious of the new guy. I mentioned I had the thought of Rose having an important role with her being replaced. But then decided it was only to keep the game active. And I never acted on it. I was critical of the way Moose had voted for the new guy...not really understanding and throwing a vote on him, leaving and possibly not being able to come back if she needed to change it. Now she just mentioned her suspicions of Alsark have picked up again, but Alsark hasn't even said anything today yet. Moose, why are you suspicious of him?

I don't want to say quite yet.

Moose @ 14/6/2015 23:10

Christian @ 14/6/2015 23:00 There's probably at least one (or two) Innocent Children running around since Rob's role mentioned any children visiting him would be too afraid to. And someone mentioned the Arsonist in connection to Schrauben, which might have been the reason he was killed? I'm pretty sure he died due to his role. I need to look back. I'll correct myself if that's not the case.

Okay yea I was wrong. I thought it had said something completely different. There may be an arsonist, but maybe someone killed schruab because they thought the fire was sk? Probably thinking too much into it as always.

There are probably people with children or child-like roles, so if they tried to follow Rob, it would be blocked.

CherryBerry @ 14/6/2015 23:20

I find it odd that Curtis managed to post within a minute of the thread opening up, only to say, "Hey."

That's just Curtis.

Tricks @ 15/6/2015 0:01

@moose, do you have any reason to suspect alsark besides replacing in? craig replaced zersch too

I have another reason that I don't want to say, But the first reason for suspicion, yes. I'm suspicious of Craig, too, but I don't see him post much, so I don't see it as a great role replacement.

Craig may become active, but for now, I'm looking at Alsark more. I don't have anything concrete yet, though, so I may be looking at him for the wrong reasons.

Boc @ 15/6/2015 0:10

Moose @ 14/6/2015 23:06 Craig may become active, but for now, I'm looking at Alsark more. I don't have anything concrete yet, though, so I may be looking at him for the wrong reasons. can we not just throw out random "I find this guy suspicious" comments without anything to back them up? It's pretty counter-productive and even a tad scummy since it's so easy to backpedal from

Gonna make a quick reply while catching up. I am not more suspicious for no reason. I have a reason, but I don't want to say it yet. Trust me, guys.

Tricks @ 15/6/2015 0:11

you have a reason you'd like to keep to yourself but you don't have anything concrete? that makes zero sense

I worded it wrong. I have something, but idk what to do with it.

Colby @ 15/6/2015 15:27

Moose, I think whatever intel you have on Alsark should probably be expressed. I agree with what a few other people have said about you now having somewhat of a target on your back for that, so at this point it's best to express what you have to say on the matter.

I'll be fine with it if anyone else agrees. Whether I have a target on my back or not, whatever. With my luck, it'll just be nothing.

Alsark visited Cake last night. I'm thinking he might be scum doc.

It was the first thought that popped in my head. Sue me.