Stocking @ 28/12/2017 20:26

Is that you? It's lit

Spin @ 28/12/2017 20:35

Timmah wasn't who I was looking for.

See if you can submit Patrick as an option

Helios Garabandia @ 28/12/2017 20:17

Fair point. So, if we assume there IS a vig, then we're missing a kill N1 and N3 (or the same person was targeted more than once in both N1 and N3)?

We would be missing a kill on N1 and N2. We're not missing a kill on N3 if Sock is being honest. Which IDK what I think of that yet.

Middle of the night votals cuz I can't sleep

Sock (6/11) - TT, Maddie, Buffy, Nav, Timmah, spin

Well, looks like the stocking is finally getting hung!

##lynch sock

But this should not be our only topic of discussion today I feelike alot has happened behind the scenes

What do we know about Timmah?

Stocking @ 29/12/2017 0:12

Primate @ 29/12/2017 4:04 Sockie, Why didn't you mention the bp thing yesterday? Who are your top scum reads? Top scum reads: Chris, Porl, Garlic

But Chris is town

Can't really mention anything that hasn't been so far.

Sock looks like the way to go. That was potentially a vig kill since it was requested yesterday.

Spin seemingly trying to make his target smaller after being the biggest distraction days 1 and 2.

TIB doesn't look that great here, obviously. But he hasn't said anything yet to explain which also looks bad

I honestly thought Zersch looked really scummy, but bad that we lost our watcher. Anyone look through any of his posts for any leads? I don't think he really said much of anything that wasn't joking posts though, to be honest

Bryce @ 29/12/2017 7:27

Stocking @ 29/12/2017 0:12 Primate @ 29/12/2017 4:04 Sockie, Why didn't you mention the bp thing yesterday? Who are your top scum reads? Top scum reads: Chris, Porl, Garlic But Chris is town

DId I miss a claim or something?

Day 4 Lynch Count

Sock (7/11) - TT, Maddie, Buffy, Nav, Timmah, Spin, Darkus

I don't like sock's reaction and explanation of things. As I've stated before, just too many things have to be exactly true to now fit his evolving explanation.

Then throw in his scum reads: 1) inactive Porl 2) lolChrist 3) the always scummy easy to accuse garlic. There is no effort in those reads as all 3 fall into the easy way out category (and yes, I know I'm slightly biased here).

Snowflake poker @ 29/12/2017 8:29

I don't like sock's reaction and explanation of things. As I've stated before, just too many things have to be exactly true to now fit his evolving explanation. Then throw in his scum reads: 1) inactive Porl 2) lolChrist 3) the always scummy easy to accuse garlic. There is no effort in those reads as all 3 fall into the easy way out category (and yes, I know I'm slightly biased here).

If he rolls kid table or in law, I feel like sock would include at least one group member on that list.

Sock
Tib
Spin
Bryce

Leaning scum on those 4 so far today.

Primate @ 29/12/2017 9:37

Snowflake poker @ 29/12/2017 8:29 I don't like sock's reaction and explanation of things. As I've stated before, just too many things have to be exactly true to now fit his evolving explanation. Then throw in his scum reads: 1) inactive Porl 2) lolChrist 3) the always scummy easy to accuse garlic. There is no effort in those reads as all 3 fall into the easy way out category (and yes, I know I'm slightly biased here). If he rolls kid table or in law, I feel like sock would include at least one group member on that list.

This argument is always made and is probably true enough to continue to be made. Doesn't change the fact the "other" two if this holds true are still easy outs.