I got a bit more than 10% which is why I asked you about it. Unless Aries or another person bussed me (that would be rude @aries) I don't know what happened.

Darren Sanders @ 11/1/2017 0:30

Timmah @ 10/1/2017 21:26 This DS boomerang claim seems to be getting more and more vague. I'm understanding less and less why he'd be targeting the perceived town smash recipient. Instead of clarification, it seems we're just getting more confusion. @nofo, what does DS' boomerang do? @mittens, What you said yesterday doesn't change the fact of your own voting actions, nor the fact that your only claim to scum hunting in any fashion is suggesting that we should have a system for items. Idk how its getting more vague, I've been saying the whole time that I thought it hit both the target and the visitors with a chance at blocking them. I also pretty clearly stated I had no problem attacking the final smash recipient seeing how I have no idea how they are aligned and wouldnt mind stealing it from them.

Well we are pretty clearly voting for smash based on town reads. So, if the smash recipient is town, and the argument is that scum may want to attack them to steal it or prevent its use, then by attacking the smash recipient you are dealing damage to them (maybe not, but you didn't know that), maybe scum if they visit, and maybe town if they try to protect the smash recipient. All the while, "maybe" you block someone also, but who knows if it would be scum or town or whatever? Sounds like great town thinking to me!

##Lynch: Curtis

Top of my list now that the others are dead (:

Has only been joaking, focusing on a single person (J$), and claiming to have been damaged (just like Christian did).

Nifi @ 11/1/2017 0:34

Timmah @ 11/1/2017 1:26 This DS boomerang claim seems to be getting more and more vague. I'm understanding less and less why he'd be targeting the perceived town smash recipient. Instead of clarification, it seems we're just getting more confusion. @nofo, what does DS' boomerang do? @mittens, What you said yesterday doesn't change the fact of your own voting actions, nor the fact that your only claim to scum hunting in any fashion is suggesting that we should have a system for items. exactly what he listed. 10 to his target and 10 to everyone who visits them

Any mention of a block? Also odd that none of his targets have been hit for the 10 until maybe last night.

Now that we know that Jamie received more than 10%, I think it's safe to say that none of his targets have been hit for 10%.

BadgerMcBeaver @ 11/1/2017 0:38

Now that we know that Jamie received more than 10%, I think it's safe to say that none of his targets have been hit for 10%.

Could've been a combo of people?

Timmah @ 10/1/2017 21:34

Darren Sanders @ 11/1/2017 0:30 Timmah @ 10/1/2017 21:26 This DS boomerang claim seems to be getting more and more vague. I'm understanding less and less why he'd be targeting the perceived town smash recipient. Instead of clarification, it seems we're just getting more confusion. @nofo, what does DS' boomerang do? @mittens, What you said yesterday doesn't change the fact of your own voting actions, nor the fact that your only claim to scum hunting in any fashion is suggesting that we should have a system for items. Idk how its getting more vague, I've been saying the whole time that I thought it hit both the target and the visitors with a chance at blocking them. I also pretty clearly stated I had no problem attacking the final smash recipient seeing how I have no idea how they are aligned and wouldnt mind stealing it from them. Well we are pretty clearly voting for smash based on town reads. So, if the smash recipient is town, and the argument is that scum may want to attack them to steal it or prevent its use, then by attacking the smash recipient you are dealing damage to them (maybe not, but you didn't know that), maybe scum if they visit, and maybe town if they try to protect the smash recipient. All the while, "maybe" you block someone also, but who knows if it would be scum or town or whatever? Sounds like great town thinking to me!

Umm, no, we are voting based off of what seems to be a block of four or five people who are controlling where the smashes go. I pointed this out yesterday.

Timmah @ 11/1/2017 1:35

Nifi @ 11/1/2017 0:34 Timmah @ 11/1/2017 1:26 This DS boomerang claim seems to be getting more and more vague. I'm understanding less and less why he'd be targeting the perceived town smash recipient. Instead of clarification, it seems we're just getting more confusion. @nofo, what does DS' boomerang do? @mittens, What you said yesterday doesn't change the fact of your own voting actions, nor the fact that your only claim to scum hunting in any fashion is suggesting that we should have a system for items. exactly what he listed. 10 to his target and 10 to everyone who visits them Any mention of a block? Also odd that none of his targets have been hit for the 10 until maybe last night.

no. I only know one action.

Timmah @ 10/1/2017 21:35

Nifi @ 11/1/2017 0:34 Timmah @ 11/1/2017 1:26 This DS boomerang claim seems to be getting more and more vague. I'm understanding less and less why he'd be targeting the perceived town smash recipient. Instead of clarification, it seems we're just getting more confusion. @nofo, what does DS' boomerang do? @mittens, What you said yesterday doesn't change the fact of your own voting actions, nor the fact that your only claim to scum hunting in any fashion is suggesting that we should have a system for items. exactly what he listed. 10 to his target and 10 to everyone who visits them Any mention of a block? Also odd that none of his targets have been hit for the 10 until maybe last night.

My actions doesnt say block, it says possibility of causing a flinch.

Who is controlling that? Jamie had almost all the smash votes... most people have discussed that they're voting to smash their town reads...

i think boc may be editing what he sends me now because i didn't get that part about flinches.

That wouldn't make any sense

Timmah @ 11/1/2017 1:45

That wouldn't make any sense

no, he might be removing flavor info.

Timmah @ 10/1/2017 21:42

Who is controlling that? Jamie had almost all the smash votes... most people have discussed that they're voting to smash their town reads...

See these three posts of mine from yesterday:
www.ndimforums.com/fe/thread.asp?threadid=5469&pagenum=27&pp=18#265312

http://www.ndimforums.com/fe/thread.asp?threadid=5469&pagenum=27&pp=18#265317

http://www.ndimforums.com/fe/thread.asp?threadid=5469&pagenum=27&pp=18#265321

Timmah @ 11/1/2017 0:40

BadgerMcBeaver @ 11/1/2017 0:38 Now that we know that Jamie received more than 10%, I think it's safe to say that none of his targets have been hit for 10%. Could've been a combo of people?

I guess it's possible but I doubt it. I know for a fact that it didn't harm me when it was used against me, so unless I am unharmed because someone used an action to protecting me, it doesn't really appear that the person targeted with the boomerang receives the 10% damage.