|
PORL
UNFORGIVABLE
| Reputation: 153 | Group: | Admin | Posts: | 4,222 | Joined: | Jun 22, 2012 |
| Post #121: 11th Jan 2013 9:28 PM | |
I liked it!
|
I agree with Hupu in that the most enjoyable part for me wasn't the plot, the characters or even the effects. It was how lovingly crafted the world was. While overt cartoonish behaviour or illogical character motives will destroy immersion, I didn't get that here. It's because the world was so detailed and fully realised that it's easy to become lost in it. You don't feel like there are boundaries to each and every set. You feel like the entire world exists because it's portrayed as it is.
WIth regards to the plot, it falls short of LOTR but that should come as no surprise. I never finished the book (LOTR or The Hobbit). I only ever read as far as the troll capture so I'm not overly familiar with the source material here. The action scenes were the only things that particularly dragged as, like Boc says, nothing felt at stake. I think if the first battle with the orcs before Rivendell was removed or shortened, as well as a good portion of the goblin segment that nothing of value would have been lost.
Everything in Bag-end was thoroughly enjoyable. Smeagol was incredible, as somebody who doesn't share in the world's unanimous love affair with Serkis' adaptation. I actually felt genuinely sympathetic for him, particularly knowing his backstory and what lays ahead.
I loved the stuff with the necromancer. Radagast was silly but when coupled with that dark plot, it worked fine. Rivendell and the council dragged though. Is that segment true to the original story because some of it just seemed like fanservice and an excuse to re-use the actors.
I liked Azog. I didn't think too much was lost by him being CGI. The CGI WAS very noticeable and distracting though at times. |
| |
| | |
PORL
UNFORGIVABLE
| Reputation: 153 | Group: | Admin | Posts: | 4,222 | Joined: | Jun 22, 2012 |
| Post #122: 11th Jan 2013 9:33 PM | |
Oh and
|
If Smaug is the most expensive creation on film to date, judging from the "cliffhanger" establishing shot of his nostril and eye, somebody really pissed that money away. It just looked like a generic CGI run of the mill dragon. Maybe more proof that we still aren't quite close to there when it comes to CGI.
I still think the most impressively realised full on CGI character I've ever seen in a movie to date is Davy Jones from POTC. One of the only cases where I legitimately thought it was a costume before doing the research. |
| |
| | |
Boc
| Reputation: 157 | Group: | Admin | Posts: | 19,128 | Joined: | Jun 22, 2012 |
| Post #123: 12th Jan 2013 12:29 AM | |
|
Oh and
|
If Smaug is the most expensive creation on film to date, judging from the "cliffhanger" establishing shot of his nostril and eye, somebody really pissed that money away. It just looked like a generic CGI run of the mill dragon. Maybe more proof that we still aren't quite close to there when it comes to CGI.
I still think the most impressively realised full on CGI character I've ever seen in a movie to date is Davy Jones from POTC. One of the only cases where I legitimately thought it was a costume before doing the research. |
|
|
To be fair, the brief shots of Gollum in FOTR looked pretty shitty compared to what was to come in TT/ROTK. So they might not have had Smaug fully figured out yet when they did that shot
And I agree about Davy Jones. |
| |
| | |
Pa Hupu
The Jewbear
| Reputation: 11 | Group: | Regular | Posts: | 810 | Joined: | Jun 26, 2012 |
| Post #124: 12th Jan 2013 1:26 AM | |
Yeah |
I think there's every indication they just hadn't completed it by the end of this one. Or it could be that they're just waiting till the sequel to get a MONEY SHOT |
| |
| | |
Boc
| Reputation: 157 | Group: | Admin | Posts: | 19,128 | Joined: | Jun 22, 2012 |
| Post #125: 9th Jun 2013 4:05 PM | |
| |
| | |
mal
Pronouns: they/them
| Reputation: 104 | Group: | Overlord | Posts: | 12,650 | Joined: | Jun 26, 2012 |
| Post #126: 9th Jun 2013 4:17 PM | |
Oooh...
like I needed a reason to be excited! | |
| | |
Ari
Snowman Overlord
| Reputation: 32 | Group: | Elite | Posts: | 3,189 | Joined: | Jun 26, 2012 |
| Post #127: 9th Jun 2013 4:22 PM | |
December 13th is my birthday. This is no coincidence. | |
| | |
mal
Pronouns: they/them
| Reputation: 104 | Group: | Overlord | Posts: | 12,650 | Joined: | Jun 26, 2012 |
| Post #128: 9th Jun 2013 4:27 PM | |
|
December 13th is my birthday. This is no coincidence. |
Well I'll be in line for the movie for my birthday just like last year. Although I think it's a day earlier than last years release. | |
| | |
Curtis
First Place Dick
| Reputation: 1,169 | Group: | Admin | Posts: | 78,985 | Joined: | Jun 22, 2012 |
| Post #129: 10th Jun 2013 12:27 AM | |
Can't wait | |
| | |
Curtis
First Place Dick
| Reputation: 1,169 | Group: | Admin | Posts: | 78,985 | Joined: | Jun 22, 2012 |
| Post #130: 11th Jun 2013 3:21 PM | |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeGb5XGk2U0
TRAILER!
Lots of breathtaking shots. I love the long shots of the cities so much. Just so perfectly done
LEGOLAS! My boy. And Kate doesn't look too shitty tbh. Can't wait for Legolas action scenes | |
| | |
Nobert
Cerberus
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Elite | Posts: | 4,552 | Joined: | Jun 25, 2012 |
| Post #131: 11th Jun 2013 3:39 PM | |
They showed SMAUG!! I was hoping they keep his look under wraps until the movie. | |
| | |
mal
Pronouns: they/them
| Reputation: 104 | Group: | Overlord | Posts: | 12,650 | Joined: | Jun 26, 2012 |
| Post #132: 11th Jun 2013 5:18 PM | |
I am so fucking pumped now!
I hope we can get more minor dwarf action in this one! Half of them in the first movie had one line or less. | |
| | |
Boc
| Reputation: 157 | Group: | Admin | Posts: | 19,128 | Joined: | Jun 22, 2012 |
| Post #133: 11th Jun 2013 5:18 PM | |
Meh! Okay trailer. Smaug didn't look that amazing really | |
| | |
mal
Pronouns: they/them
| Reputation: 104 | Group: | Overlord | Posts: | 12,650 | Joined: | Jun 26, 2012 |
| Post #134: 11th Jun 2013 5:24 PM | |
He was shrouded in darkness what the fuck do you want? | |
| | |
Boc
| Reputation: 157 | Group: | Admin | Posts: | 19,128 | Joined: | Jun 22, 2012 |
| Post #135: 11th Jun 2013 5:50 PM | |
Shouldn't being shrouded in darkness make him look less shitty? | |
| | |
5 Users Viewing (5 Guests) |
|
|