J A M I E @ 9/1/2018 13:29

Herm @ 9/1/2018 13:27 Jamie, you said you breadcrumbed your role, but I don't see how or when. hehe oh it’s there alright

Posts please.

Jamie if you scanned me on night 4 and multiple people pointed out how I was likely not in-laws because of how hard I went after lamps when I could have just as easily pressured sock, how in the world could you have such a problem buying my role claim?

I'm torn between Herm and Jamie right now.

Snowflake poker @ 9/1/2018 14:53

Jamie if you scanned me on night 4 and multiple people pointed out how I was likely not in-laws because of how hard I went after lamps when I could have just as easily pressured sock, how in the world could you have such a problem buying my role claim?

it was your reaction that made me really not buy your claim, it didn't sit well with me

J A M I E @ 9/1/2018 15:37

Snowflake poker @ 9/1/2018 14:53 Jamie if you scanned me on night 4 and multiple people pointed out how I was likely not in-laws because of how hard I went after lamps when I could have just as easily pressured sock, how in the world could you have such a problem buying my role claim? it was your reaction that made me really not buy your claim, it didn't sit well with me

You are going to have to do better than that. I can read yesterday to see that is what you said; however, the facts you had at your disposal, especially you personally having confirmation I wasn't one of the factions makes this argument even stankier.

Primate @ 9/1/2018 15:13

I'm torn between Herm and Jamie right now.

At this point, it doesn't appear we can go wrong.

You can go wrong.

Jamie's the safe bet for today, though.

Town can absolutely lose the game.

Herm @ 9/1/2018 15:55

You can go wrong. Jamie's the safe bet for today, though.

you're the safe bet

I'm in the middle of packing/sorting through my stuff, but I'm here.

I'm the safe bet in granting town a guaranteed defeat with a capital D.

So, I'm about 98% sure that Jamie is lying ass scum. But my only reservation is that we did, in fact, have an In-Law Cop...and it would be weird as hell that we had an In-Law Cop, but not a Kids Table Cop.

Helios Garabandia @ 9/1/2018 16:20

So, I'm about 98% sure that Jamie is lying ass scum. But my only reservation is that we did, in fact, have an In-Law Cop...and it would be weird as hell that we had an In-Law Cop, but not a Kids Table Cop.

I see two potential issues with this.

1) We had a census taker that could help balance things out. A role not normally seen in games, especially without a faction that can recruit.
2) Scum should have been considering this too and instead they killed our redneck, trump loving miller Spin.

Herm shouldn't be alive because his role could take out scum via a lynch. Jamie should have had more likelihood than spin of being killed last night.

As for Herm, his Vengeful claim (and the Bomb crumbing he did before the claim) is a very good scum play. It helps make anyone with a kill NOT want to go after him during the Night (this part especially when he was crumbing), and it makes people not want to Lynch him during the day, which helps keep him very much alive as long as possible.

Farlig

Herm shouldn't be alive because his role could take out scum via a lynch.

This could be a miscalculation on scum's end.

Kid's faction probably think I'm In-Law, and In-Law faction think I'm Kid.

Either way, 2 active town and an inactive town vs 1 scum on Night 9 doesn't sound like good odds to me, unless the inactive townsperson is scum.