Timmah @ 10/1/2017 21:16

Darren Sanders @ 11/1/2017 0:08 Then I have absolutely no idea what your role is lmao I thought I did Does your boomerang stop actions on your target? Or just deal damage to your target and anyone visiting them?

My understanding (and im paraphrasing here) is that i target someone and all of the targets visitors get hit for 10% with the possibility of making the people it hits flinch. I initially thought that it also hit the person I targeted, but the first two nights helios and badger said they didnt get hit and that they successfully used their final smash

Mittens @ 11/1/2017 0:11

BadgerMcBeaver @ 10/1/2017 22:49 Mittens @ 10/1/2017 22:45 This goes without saying, but I am finding it difficult in this game to narrow down possible scum due to the fact folks are able to avoid lynches all together by claiming items. It would have been perfect to have lynched someone yesterday when we only had 2 players claiming an item, in order to read into the votes more. If we could come up with some sort of a system to keep the item claiming to a lower number, it may be beneficial to us later in the game for vote analysis. Yesterday, there were literally only 2 people who claimed an item. How much lower do you expect it to go? And the day before actually had very interesting lynch trains. If you're going to try and be productive, why don't you try to analyze the lynch trains we have available to us instead of trying to solve problems that aren't really problems. Try reading the day again to figure out why there were only 2 people, then get back to me.

Mittens @ 11/1/2017 0:11

BadgerMcBeaver @ 10/1/2017 22:49 Mittens @ 10/1/2017 22:45 This goes without saying, but I am finding it difficult in this game to narrow down possible scum due to the fact folks are able to avoid lynches all together by claiming items. It would have been perfect to have lynched someone yesterday when we only had 2 players claiming an item, in order to read into the votes more. If we could come up with some sort of a system to keep the item claiming to a lower number, it may be beneficial to us later in the game for vote analysis. Yesterday, there were literally only 2 people who claimed an item. How much lower do you expect it to go? And the day before actually had very interesting lynch trains. If you're going to try and be productive, why don't you try to analyze the lynch trains we have available to us instead of trying to solve problems that aren't really problems. Try reading the day again to figure out why there were only 2 people, then get back to me.

The reason why there were only 2 people claiming the hammer isn't really something that matters to today's discussion because it won't help us find scum. If you disagree with me, feel free to explain why.

What actually matters is that you are making the excuse that it's too difficult to narrow down possible scum due to too many people claiming items, when in reality there were literally only 2 people who claimed an items yesterday (and there was a great deal of discussion about the subject to read into). You are trying to duck out of scum hunting which is suspicious behavior.

Stop bitching about problems that don't exist and start actually scum hunting if you're legitimately town, which at this point I am getting doubtful of.

Oops sorry for the double quote.

You are missing the point completely, but whatever.

## lynch Johnny Dollar

This DS boomerang claim seems to be getting more and more vague. I'm understanding less and less why he'd be targeting the perceived town smash recipient. Instead of clarification, it seems we're just getting more confusion.

@nofo, what does DS' boomerang do?

@mittens, What you said yesterday doesn't change the fact of your own voting actions, nor the fact that your only claim to scum hunting in any fashion is suggesting that we should have a system for items.

Timmah @ 10/1/2017 20:54

Mercator @ 10/1/2017 23:50 Timmah @ 10/1/2017 20:44 ##lynch merc Hey, any reason why? Yes, I read you as scum. Vote patterns, blending in, etc and so forth

Like lynching the same target you did?

Cool.

Mercator @ 11/1/2017 0:26

Timmah @ 10/1/2017 20:54 Mercator @ 10/1/2017 23:50 Timmah @ 10/1/2017 20:44 ##lynch merc Hey, any reason why? Yes, I read you as scum. Vote patterns, blending in, etc and so forth Like lynching the same target you did? Cool.

You trying to buddy up to me?

Boc @ 10/1/2017 19:09

Ganondorf stood on the bow of the ship, sitting crosslegged and staring out at the vast ocean ahead of him. After Bowser's death, it seemed Ganondorf had very little to live for these days. His sole goal in life had already been achieved for him.

Did this sound to anyone else like Ganondorf had already won a secondary win condition or something?

Timmah @ 10/1/2017 21:26

This DS boomerang claim seems to be getting more and more vague. I'm understanding less and less why he'd be targeting the perceived town smash recipient. Instead of clarification, it seems we're just getting more confusion. @nofo, what does DS' boomerang do? @mittens, What you said yesterday doesn't change the fact of your own voting actions, nor the fact that your only claim to scum hunting in any fashion is suggesting that we should have a system for items.

Idk how its getting more vague, I've been saying the whole time that I thought it hit both the target and the visitors with a chance at blocking them.

I also pretty clearly stated I had no problem attacking the final smash recipient seeing how I have no idea how they are aligned and wouldnt mind stealing it from them.

my final smash was used btw

Now that you are trying to throw shade on me though, I want to know more about whatever you know about who visited me last night Timmah

jamie ♂ @ 10/1/2017 21:31

my final smash was used btw

Did you get hit for 10% or no?

Mittens @ 11/1/2017 0:24

You are missing the point completely, but whatever.

Why don't you try explaining it one more time?

To me, pushing for us to use a system for allocating item distribution when one is more or less already in place is a way of appearing to help town without actually helping. Which is what scum is usually looking to do and also why I find you to be sus right now. But if I'm wrong, I'd love for you to explain why.

Also, I'd like to know some of your reads in general beyond the fact that Ahoda came off as super scummy yesterday (which I agree with but is super obvious at the moment). Anyone else who's been pinging your scumdar?

Timmah @ 11/1/2017 1:26

This DS boomerang claim seems to be getting more and more vague. I'm understanding less and less why he'd be targeting the perceived town smash recipient. Instead of clarification, it seems we're just getting more confusion. @nofo, what does DS' boomerang do? @mittens, What you said yesterday doesn't change the fact of your own voting actions, nor the fact that your only claim to scum hunting in any fashion is suggesting that we should have a system for items.

exactly what he listed.
10 to his target and 10 to everyone who visits them