I want a decent WR. And the Seahawks defense. :/

Boc @ 16/9/2013 6:33

Wells?

I need to stop doing this.

Davis.

Vernon Davis.
Vernon Wells.


I dont know why I keep doing this lol

Vespis @ 16/9/2013 7:06

I want a decent WR. And the Seahawks defense. :/

im open to a trade bro

Vespis @ 16/9/2013 2:06

I want a decent WR. And the Seahawks defense. :/

I've got decent ones! WHAT'S YOUR BEST OFFER?

Boc @ 16/9/2013 1:34

And nice try Paco but Emmanuel Sanders ain't getting 25 points 2-0 WHO'S NEXT!!!

Lucky I forgot to put Royal in otherwise I would have won.

Yeah I'm screwed. all my good players got shit scores and the ones that were supposed to suck got more points god dammit projections!

Seahawks D is untouchable for me now! and to think I sat them because I thought SF would put up a fight -_-

Raptor @ 15/9/2013 19:12

Fuck my life... I just went to cancel my trade with Bulldogs and he accepted -_- can you guys veto it please!

So you changed the settings so you could veto it? Sorry, but that seems really dodgy.

kick him out of the tourney and give me back cam newton

This one should have been treated the same as last, using admin rights like that is just wrong.

Malcolm David Nelly @ 17/9/2013 11:34

kick him out of the tourney and give me back cam newton

I'll give him a chance to put the trade back first.

lol not a big deal at all to me. I'm sure everyone would've just veto'd it for him (: . He probably just did that to save time

He did it because he saw one of the guys did well, but the trade was already accepted. The last one that was veto'd hadn't gone to games yet.

I'm starting to feel like I can't trust these projections.

Natalie @ 17/9/2013 13:18

He did it because he saw one of the guys did well, but the trade was already accepted. The last one that was veto'd hadn't gone to games yet.

If you scroll back, you'll see that I asked for it to be veto'd, and I also mentioned that I had gone into cancel that trade, but it was accepted at that time. Don't just listen to one side, it's not like I offered him the trade the day of and cancelled it 12 hours later, that offer had been there for almost 4 days before he accepted it, and I got the sense despite my request to veto it, not enough people would have seen it to do so in time so I saw nothing wrong. If I had known about veto'ing trades like this before, I would have veto'd the first trade that involved Newton and Ridley like this for the person as well, I wasn't aware you could change it though at that point.

I'll make the offer again, but it's either going to be without Moreno, or without Brown. I'm not giving up 4 guys. If not, then feel free to delete my account and kick me out since you seem so pissed off about it. I admit, I shouldn't have done it, but, I don't see why your getting so worked up, it would have probably been veto'd like I asked, and I'd like to reiterate, it's not like I offered him the trade and backed out 6 hours later, that trade was there for more then a few days and it just so happened the first chance I got on Sunday to cancel it, and make offers to other people, he had accepted. So do with this what you want Nat.