2 additional things on my Angi tangent:

1. She said she didn't know tricks posted that he had an extra vote because she was reading and posting at the time. Tricks posted that at 652, Angi posted something else at 702, and then Angi voted at 715. Her attempt to backtrack out of being called out on that is a straight up lie from where I'm sitting.

2. I just reread all of the day 3. I saw no soft claim from Angi. Maybe I just missed it, but since I already have Christian and Angi as being aligned, did anyone else see it?

Timmah @ 18/6/2015 23:34

2 additional things on my Angi tangent: 1. She said she didn't know tricks posted that he had an extra vote because she was reading and posting at the time. Tricks posted that at 652, Angi posted something else at 702, and then Angi voted at 715. Her attempt to backtrack out of being called out on that is a straight up lie from where I'm sitting. 2. I just reread all of the day 3. I saw no soft claim from Angi. Maybe I just missed it, but since I already have Christian and Angi as being aligned, did anyone else see it?

My knowledge of mafia roles is deplorable, but I also decided to scan and can't say I found it.

CherryBerry @ 18/6/2015 22:35

Timmah @ 18/6/2015 23:34 2 additional things on my Angi tangent: 1. She said she didn't know tricks posted that he had an extra vote because she was reading and posting at the time. Tricks posted that at 652, Angi posted something else at 702, and then Angi voted at 715. Her attempt to backtrack out of being called out on that is a straight up lie from where I'm sitting. 2. I just reread all of the day 3. I saw no soft claim from Angi. Maybe I just missed it, but since I already have Christian and Angi as being aligned, did anyone else see it? My knowledge of mafia roles is deplorable, but I also decided to scan and can't say I found it.

How do you even soft claim in a game where the host starts out by saying everyone has at least 2 roles (in some fashion between active and passive roles)?

Timmah @ 19/6/2015 3:16

BadgerMcBeaver @ 18/6/2015 21:59 Just want to clarify Moose that you are 100% sure that the 'chaotic' group that you were referring was specifically a Mafia and not potentially something else? There's got to be a cult out there somewhere and it strikes me as really bizarre that there would be both a 'random' mafia and a 'chaotic' mafia because that seems like basically the same thing to me. I don't understand why people are worrying about quick lynch trains when the lynched person actually ended up being a mafia member (and it looks like their leader, based on his role?). Is there something I am missing here? Badger seems to be really downplaying anything having to do with a chaotic mafia. Could be aligned with Angi. Yet to be determined but worth noting for future reference as we get more info.

I guess I can see how it would look like I am trying to downplay their existence, but I think I'm just coming across that way because I find the info a little odd (I don't see what that has to do with Angi though?). It just feels strange to me that there would be 'The Stabilizers', 'The Randomizers' which seem to follow a particular pattern in how they've been named, and then there is one named "The Chaotic Mafia". Of course that isn't anything concrete but I also find it a bit odd that it was mentioned in Moose's role description which is a completely unverifiable source.

Regardless, I think it is probably for the best if we assume that there IS a second mafia for now because we're better to be safe than sorry.

Hermmmmmmmmm NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

i want to lynch buffy or teebs.

why is cherry confirmed? couldn't a mafia target the child's cry boy since he outed himself the day before, and copy his abilities?

also someone had sex with me two nights ago, i got silenced, blocked, everything happened to me D:<

##Teebs

like, he would be modkilled/replaced if he weren't active, no?

Timmah @ 18/6/2015 22:34

2 additional things on my Angi tangent: 1. She said she didn't know tricks posted that he had an extra vote because she was reading and posting at the time. Tricks posted that at 652, Angi posted something else at 702, and then Angi voted at 715. Her attempt to backtrack out of being called out on that is a straight up lie from where I'm sitting. 2. I just reread all of the day 3. I saw no soft claim from Angi. Maybe I just missed it, but since I already have Christian and Angi as being aligned, did anyone else see it?

I didn't see anything either.

Cake @ 19/6/2015 5:55

i want to lynch buffy or teebs.

What are your thoughts on Walk?

Timmah you're just tunelling right now. I don't really like that push for Angi and I think there are better lynches for today.

Angi, Moose, Cake, and Merc are among the ppl I trust the most right now.

*tunneling

Also, there seem to be role conditions that force ppl to post certain things. Speculating that Sami has to mention that she's town every day. I can see scum having that condition and getting a very strong ability in return. Town not so much.

So based on that plus the fact that Sami hasn't rly shared thoughts on others or brought novel thoughts to the table makes me thinks she is scum.

##lynch Sami

I'd also be fine with a Teebs lynch just bcuz. Or Shawn or Vic like wtf, but rn there is little we can say about them lol.

Daniel @ 18/6/2015 23:17

*tunneling Also, there seem to be role conditions that force ppl to post certain things. Speculating that Sami has to mention that she's town every day. I can see scum having that condition and getting a very strong ability in return. Town not so much. So based on that plus the fact that Sami hasn't rly shared thoughts on others or brought novel thoughts to the table makes me thinks she is scum. ##lynch Sami I'd also be fine with a Teebs lynch just bcuz. Or Shawn or Vic like wtf, but rn there is little we can say about them lol.

Guys we have to be really perpendicular today.

Not sure I like your defense of Angi, Daniel. What makes her so town to you?