What did Jamie claim?

Helios Garabandia @ 9/1/2018 8:00

What did Jamie claim?

Master Breadcrumber

So when do we lynch the snowflake (J A M I E) for using the excuse of what happened D1 and D2 to basically mail in the game?

Post by day:

1 - 10
2 - 18
3 - 6
4 - 20
5 - 8
6 - 14
7 - 15
8 - 10

With his last post yesterday including "brb."

Herm, no offense, but you'd be dead by now if you actually were town. Scum doesn't exactly want someone that if they lynch them they'll more than likely lose a number hanging around this late in the game. Killing miller spin over you makes zero sense.

Snowflake poker @ 9/1/2018 7:28

Herm, no offense, but you'd be dead by now if you actually were town. Scum doesn't exactly want someone that if they lynch them they'll more than likely lose a number hanging around this late in the game. Killing miller spin over you makes zero sense.

I agree.

Helios Garabandia @ 8/1/2018 20:42

Okay, so we had three kills. Again. Meaning that 317 was full of bullshit about the "inactive in-law".

Maybe distancing.

or 317 and porl are scumbuddies and he was tossing the inactive under the bus.

The only person in-active is PORL and he's been on this site enough to have been submitting kills via PM here or back through a scum forum if he is in fact scum which we have no way of seeing whether he is active or not there.

Roles in order of "proveness" to lack of proof -

18. Farlig - proven town BP
27. Primate - proven messenger

31. Helios - claimed priest, voting backs up claim

6. Jamie - breadcrumbed who knows what
8. Herm - claimed but unproven town vengeful
30. PORL - who the fuck knows besides inactive

So basically, today we decide in which order Jamie, Herm, and PORL get to die.

A proper claim from Jamie would help make that choice MUCH easier for us.

Helios Garabandia @ 9/1/2018 9:57

A proper claim from Jamie would help make that choice MUCH easier for us.

Even showing up would be nice. He sure took a hard stand that he didn't believe me yesterday.