I do agree w/ the FF lynch though because yeah he could have flipped to be the cop or doc but he wasn't being very useful even if he was, and he may not have protected or scanned anyone in the night, so if we're gonna lynch anyone, I agree with it having been him. Like, it sucks he was town but we had to do something, and simply no-lynching would have left us open in the night to a kill and having lynched no one would have left us with even less possible info. At least we tried!

Also lucky for us it seems the maf killed third party hehe

Glad the fucking cult is gone.

On Simp, I agree with Animal. Simp suggesting no lynch is nothing new. The fact that he stands by it is probably more to do with a different play style. I imagine using webcams and shit makes it a whole different game. And a kind of creepy one too, but whatever.

Jeffrey is doing a pretty bad job of defending himself, but right now I am thinking it is just Jeffrey been Jeffrey.

I still don't like Ari's random lynch on Angi yesterday. Also, when called upon for explanation, he said this:

Ari

Just a random lynch. See how she would react.

I guess you could say he was just fooling around, but it was late in the day. He didn't make much effort to say anything else either. This was all forgotten about a little too quickly for me.

##Lynch Ari

oh wikey I thought we where pals!

I dont really see Simp as scum

Jeff (1/14) - Boc
Angi (1/14) - Ari
Wikey (1/14) - Merc
FF (9/14) - Curtis, Angi, Perry, Animal, Vic, Wikey, Rob, Earthbound, Nofo
Perry (1/14) - Matt

Lot of people here bandwagoned onto that FF train.

Didnt vote:
AlexIGuess
Buffy
Colby
DD
Greenday
im317
Justin
Nobert
Paco
Patrick
Shawn
Simp

Lot of quite people I forgot where playing

Who to go for im not sure though. Perry seems a bit scummy to me but thats about it

Animal @ 9/12/2013 6:00

We really didn't get much info from D1, imo. Like people lynched others, but I don't think that's very scummy since FF was town anyway. The only thing I have questions for is why Vic can't lynch today but for some reason, I doubt we'll be getting an answer for that today.

Most likely an inventor used one of their items.

I think Simp is just being Simp. Same with Jeff. What I am looking at is the fast pile of votes on ff yesterday for no reason. It was quite obvious he wasn't going to show up and I think a few mafia rode that train to ensure a townie lynch.

I guess I'd probably suspect that too. What I don't understand is why mafia wouldn't wanna get a train going on a more active member who already had votes on them (unless a mafia member already had votes on them... hmmm), but I guess that could also be fishy and make them stand out

Probably because it's better for Day 1 to blend in on an inactive train since that's where everyone was leaning anyway.

Simplton @ 9/12/2013 7:28

But anyway as a real defense why would I draw so much attention to myself as mafia? Why would I not just sit in the background and lynch FF for the same reason and just play it cool for now? Blowing up on town for making a move which I don't agree with isn't a very smart play as mafia.

I actually don't agree with this. I'm of the opinion that mafia would not "sit in the background and lynch FF" rather, they would just sit in the background. Unless I'm not understanding plurality, FF would have been the likely lynch since before your original D1 post. For me, it makes more sense that mafia would simply not vote and draw suspicion onto the bandwagon.

Of course, I have ulterior motives as I was one of the bandwagoners and I'm town.

Also, to add, a vote is a record we can track to nab mafia. The votes on D1 will mean a lot more in a few days, and by people not voting, I believe they are hampering town by not contributing to the evidence pool.

I literally do not understand why anyone would be OK with a no-lynch, ESPECIALLY on day ONE.

##Lynch Simp

Ya'll seem to be trying to put yourselves in the shoes of super-logical, appropriately active mafia and that probably isn't the case.

Having some BWs in these early phases does a lot of telling IMO. No reason to try and stop them.

Exactly why I didn't vote ff yesterday. While I agree no lynch on day 1 is bad there was no reason to hop on the train so late in the day just for the sake of casting a vote. Especially when (since he never showed up) there was nothing scummy to base a lynch vote off of.

Paco @ 9/12/2013 14:40

Exactly why I didn't vote ff yesterday. While I agree no lynch on day 1 is bad there was no reason to hop on the train so late in the day just for the sake of casting a vote. Especially when (since he never showed up) there was nothing scummy to base a lynch vote off of.

People here always do that for some reason.

Greenday @ 9/12/2013 14:02

I literally do not understand why anyone would be OK with a no-lynch, ESPECIALLY on day ONE. ##Lynch Simp

Something about this screams scum to me

Mercator @ 9/12/2013 10:32

Paco @ 9/12/2013 14:40 Exactly why I didn't vote ff yesterday. While I agree no lynch on day 1 is bad there was no reason to hop on the train so late in the day just for the sake of casting a vote. Especially when (since he never showed up) there was nothing scummy to base a lynch vote off of. People here always do that for some reason.

That's kind of my point though. Plurality is in effect and there are multiple votes on someone notorious for being largely inactive. If someone shows no signs of being scummy (because the haven't posted) then why pile on votes just for the sake of casting a vote when chances are that person is town?