Christian, do you think lynching SK over Mafia is better for today. Or do you just want to not lynch Town.

Christian @ 29/11/2018 16:19

so with Helios' kill, there should have been 4 attacks in total last night: 1-Josh: killed by Helios 2-Maddie (vig): killed by either Mafia or SK 3-survival (?): attacked by either Mafia, SK, or Vig (Maddie) ---Lamps claimed survival on Night 3, but not last night ---a) he's lying and actually did survive on back to back nights ---b) the person attacked and the person who did the attacking know who survived, and unless Maddie did it, I don't expect the Mafia or SK to claim the kill attempt. 4-blocked kill/no kill?: with only one known instance of a block, it's still a possibility, which makes more sense than someone not killing at this stage of the game. If it was Maddie, we won't know. And if it was Mafia or SK, we won't know. Is there any other explanation? I'd assume a kill would still go through if the attacker also died. So yeah, that's not very helpful really. lol But still think Lamps makes the most sense probably.

Other possibility is that two people targeted the same person. Josh was soft-claiming doc, sk/mafia could've targeted him thinking Helios wouldn't have killed him. Or Maddie was targeted by both sk/mafia. She was going pretty hard after Mittens, then he was killed the next night, so it's not a stretch they would've guessed her role.

Also I have not survived ANY attacks

Sorry for that confusion

Sebclops @ 29/11/2018 16:35

Christian, do you think lynching SK over Mafia is better for today. Or do you just want to not lynch Town.

I want to not lynch town.

Christian @ 29/11/2018 13:36

Sebclops @ 29/11/2018 16:35 Christian, do you think lynching SK over Mafia is better for today. Or do you just want to not lynch Town. I want to not lynch town.

Cool thanks.

Sebclops @ 29/11/2018 16:38

Christian @ 29/11/2018 13:36 Sebclops @ 29/11/2018 16:35 Christian, do you think lynching SK over Mafia is better for today. Or do you just want to not lynch Town. I want to not lynch town. Cool thanks.

no problem lol

re: Cultis v brian

While it's possible that both roles could be town, it's just as possible that one is mafia and one is town. And because of the vague nature of the role, mafia brian is claiming the real nature of his role hoping to pass it off as a town role. Don't know why Cultis is discounting that possibility.

Sebclops @ 29/11/2018 16:42

re: Cultis v brian While it's possible that both roles could be town, it's just as possible that one is mafia and one is town. And because of the vague nature of the role, mafia brian is claiming the real nature of his role hoping to pass it off as a town role. Don't know why Cultis is discounting that possibility.

I don't think he is discounting that possibility, which is why he lynched him.

Sebclops @ 29/11/2018 16:42

re: Cultis v brian While it's possible that both roles could be town, it's just as possible that one is mafia and one is town. And because of the vague nature of the role, mafia brian is claiming the real nature of his role hoping to pass it off as a town role. Don't know why Cultis is discounting that possibility.

Timmah: hey Brian, Curtis is “healer” too
Brian: cool lemme CC him randomly
Timmah: sounds good

Sebclops @ 29/11/2018 16:42

re: Cultis v brian While it's possible that both roles could be town, it's just as possible that one is mafia and one is town. And because of the vague nature of the role, mafia brian is claiming the real nature of his role hoping to pass it off as a town role. Don't know why Cultis is discounting that possibility.

Thanks for that hot tip!

itsbrianyay @ 29/11/2018 13:46

Sebclops @ 29/11/2018 16:42 re: Cultis v brian While it's possible that both roles could be town, it's just as possible that one is mafia and one is town. And because of the vague nature of the role, mafia brian is claiming the real nature of his role hoping to pass it off as a town role. Don't know why Cultis is discounting that possibility. Timmah: hey Brian, Curtis is “healer” too Brian: cool lemme CC him randomly Timmah: sounds good

You seem to have entirely missed the point I made lol

itsbrianyay @ 29/11/2018 16:46

Sebclops @ 29/11/2018 16:42 re: Cultis v brian While it's possible that both roles could be town, it's just as possible that one is mafia and one is town. And because of the vague nature of the role, mafia brian is claiming the real nature of his role hoping to pass it off as a town role. Don't know why Cultis is discounting that possibility. Timmah: hey Brian, Curtis is “healer” too Brian: cool lemme CC him randomly Timmah: sounds good

Then what happened? Can you post the convo of 317's plan to go after Jamie?

im317: brian, my love, we need to go after Jamie
Brian: anything for you my love
im317: I can’t wait until we can be together for ever. You’ll protect me, right?
Brian: At all costs.



Tbh I dunno what you mean by im317 going after Jamie but I did my best

Brian, can you give some reads?

Also Lamps?

Also Ahoda?

itsbrianyay @ 29/11/2018 15:33

Right now I have no reason to disbelieve us both as town. I don’t think as scum either one of us would openly counterclaim so early, especially in a closed role game. In terms of why there would be 2 of the same, I can’t REALLY consider that without diving into a gray area rule-wise. Maybe there’s just 2 because Shadow thought it would be funny

Mafia has flipped 2 bulletproof roles already. I don't think you both being town is out of the question at all.