Christian @ 7/4/2017 6:58

Darren Sanders @ 7/4/2017 9:56 Not even an attempt to claim, Sock? Seems fairly obvious he's been caught.

I read back. Seems like he claimed pgo, but that doesn't make sense since ahoda is bulletproof

Christian @ 7/4/2017 7:00

I agree with Buffy about the no lynch aspect in DS' claim. It seems weird to include that clause when there are no no-lynches. But I do believe he (or someone) is responsible for covering up Mittens' role. It makes sense for them to be able to take their role, since alignment was seemingly not hidden, like a full janitor.

I don't think they really thought my role through that well because the wording was vague and confusing and I had to have a long pm conversation with them just to figure it out.

Christian @ 7/4/2017 15:00

I agree with Buffy about the no lynch aspect in DS' claim. It seems weird to include that clause when there are no no-lynches. But I do believe he (or someone) is responsible for covering up Mittens' role. It makes sense for them to be able to take their role, since alignment was seemingly not hidden, like a full janitor.

There ARE no lynches though. It's in the rules post. I recommend everyone try it out!

##unlynch

##no lynch

Nvm disregard what I just said, it's not badgrian that's stupid, is us. Gg Sock lmao

Yeah no lynch means literally voting for no lynch

I'm not even sure what's being discussed right now

Christian @ 7/4/2017 10:00

I agree with Buffy about the no lynch aspect in DS' claim. It seems weird to include that clause when there are no no-lynches. But I do believe he (or someone) is responsible for covering up Mittens' role. It makes sense for them to be able to take their role, since alignment was seemingly not hidden, like a full janitor.

Hosties

7. No Lynch - If a player is uncomfortable with the day's decision, they can vote for a not to have a lynch that day.

Maddie @ 7/4/2017 2:18

Darren Sanders @ 6/4/2017 23:15 Maddie @ 6/4/2017 22:12 I forgive you for missing it but now if you are town and just claimed without looking into why so many people were on Sock it's kind of a liability for town now My role isn't that good. It's worth clearing up the inconsistency with the first lynch to make it clear with everyone Ok fair.

Not really. Claiming his role is "not that good" is also a liability for town if he's being honest and others get prioritized over him for scum kills.

Also, if DS knew he would get the role of whoever was lynched, why try to get Curtis lynched? He's still maintaining Curtis is scummy so why would he actually want Curtis's role?

Jack @ 7/4/2017 7:50

Maddie @ 7/4/2017 2:18 Darren Sanders @ 6/4/2017 23:15 Maddie @ 6/4/2017 22:12 I forgive you for missing it but now if you are town and just claimed without looking into why so many people were on Sock it's kind of a liability for town now My role isn't that good. It's worth clearing up the inconsistency with the first lynch to make it clear with everyone Ok fair. Not really. Claiming his role is "not that good" is also a liability for town if he's being honest and others get prioritized over him for scum kills. Also, if DS knew he would get the role of whoever was lynched, why try to get Curtis lynched? He's still maintaining Curtis is scummy so why would he actually want Curtis's role?

Because I wanted to be scum Buffy. I was factionless. I would've been scum had we lynched scum

Christian @ 7/4/2017 11:00

I agree with Buffy about the no lynch aspect in DS' claim. It seems weird to include that clause when there are no no-lynches. But I do believe he (or someone) is responsible for covering up Mittens' role. It makes sense for them to be able to take their role, since alignment was seemingly not hidden, like a full janitor.

I'm going to retract the "no no lynch" thing because you can actually vote for a "no lynch" which I forgot. But, I still think the TOWN in Mittens' glitched flip D1 could be a trick, or part of DS role that whoever he takes will show as TOWN but doesn't necessarily mean he is.

Jack @ 7/4/2017 11:56

Christian @ 7/4/2017 11:00 I agree with Buffy about the no lynch aspect in DS' claim. It seems weird to include that clause when there are no no-lynches. But I do believe he (or someone) is responsible for covering up Mittens' role. It makes sense for them to be able to take their role, since alignment was seemingly not hidden, like a full janitor. I'm going to retract the "no no lynch" thing because you can actually vote for a "no lynch" which I forgot. But, I still think the TOWN in Mittens' glitched flip D1 could be a trick, or part of DS role that whoever he takes will show as TOWN but doesn't necessarily mean he is.

Oh nvm, someone obviously smarter than me figured it out. :P

At work, catching up on all the pages.

##lynch miko

Lamps @ 7/4/2017 11:04

##lynch miko

Yeah fuck miko.

##lynch Sock

Timmah, why you alive dawg?