Their marriage is obviously a sham
She's just a gold digger

Igor @ 26/4/2018 16:11

Their marriage is obviously a sham She's just a gold digger

Apparently not a good one if he didn't even get her a present for her birthday.

I can't even read a Roseanne Barr tweet without hearing that voice and wanting to mount a sniper tower.

So what's this nuke deal gonna do to domestic oil in the short term? In the long term?

My guesses. Bouncing ball of panic for a month, then settle slightly higher.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/386938-gop-lawmaker-introduces-bill-requiring-pictures-of-president-vp-at-post

ALL HAIL SUPREME LEADER

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5732429/Michael-Cohen-asked-millions-dollars-pass-Trump-family-members.html

Mobsters gonna mobster

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-cant-block-users-on-twitter-federal-judge-rules/ar-AAxHvaP

Quote

Trump can't block users on Twitter, federal judge rules President Donald Trump cannot block Twitter users for the political views they have expressed, a federal judge in Manhattan ruled on Wednesday. Blocking users from viewing his Twitter account — a feature offered by the social media platform — is unconstitutional and a violation of the First Amendment, Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald wrote in her ruling.

#2018

what has this world come to

If the Presidents Twitter account is a public forum then those same people involved in that ruling would have to concede that Twitter itself is a public forum, and therefore banning popular conservatives from the platform is also a violation of free speech.

Or would Twitter be considered a private company again in that instance?

Mike @ 24/5/2018 5:57

If the Presidents Twitter account is a public forum then those same people involved in that ruling would have to concede that Twitter itself is a public forum, and therefore banning popular conservatives from the platform is also a violation of free speech. Or would Twitter be considered a private company again in that instance?

The ruling lies not on the mode of discussion itself (Twitter) but on the job of President, which requires certain protocols on communication dissemination. For example, the President isn't supposed to limit press briefings to just those press folks who are "friendly" to the administration. This follows those same protocols.

To extend your argument then would require that the Washington Post and CNN have to cover every conservative nutter because they have access to the President and therefore cannot limit. You can see that argument falls apart quickly. ;)

Why would he pull out of the Iran deal?

vladykins @ 24/5/2018 8:05

The ruling lies not on the mode of discussion itself (Twitter) but on the job of President, which requires certain protocols on communication dissemination. For example, the President isn't supposed to limit press briefings to just those press folks who are "friendly" to the administration. This follows those same protocols. To extend your argument then would require that the Washington Post and CNN have to cover every conservative nutter because they have access to the President and therefore cannot limit. You can see that argument falls apart quickly. ;)

Yeah, to be fair, I get your first point. I read something about the ruling which said that because Trump announces some things on Twitter before anywhere else, it's unconstitutional for him to block people. I see how it could be considered so.

Don't think I agree with your second point though. By calling Trumps' Twitter account a public forum, are they also implying that Twitter on the whole is a public forum? Because if they are, I think Twitter would have a duty to be politically neutral to everyone. Unless I'm misunderstanding the implication of 'public forum'

My own opinion is that they are a private company and can do what they want. I understand an exception been made for Trump though, given the way he uses it and his position.

Igor

I will bet that Trump gets impeached/removed from Presidency by the end of the year. If you want to discuss terms shoot me a message.

Wikey

I'll believe it when I see it!

Igor

wikey bet me

Igor

Wikey we should make a bet where the loser has to take a pic with the loser's country flag or some shit on their shirt

Wikey

I'm pretty drunk right now, but you're on. I promise I won't use my dronkness as an excuse if I lose I bet Trump won't be impeached

Igor

For the record I don't bet just impeachment, I'm saying he will no longer be president next year

Wikey

Under those terms, I accept! Come on Trump, don't let me down. FE needs an Igor hed

Igor on 23rd March, 2017, 9.26 AM

Hell yea, booked. GL sir Ps)

Curtis

I could make an Igor head from his Facebook right now Wikey you dumb shit

Igor!!!

I'll do it if you do it