I didn't start any of this today

Lamps @ 16/1/2017 9:43

spindoctor02 @ 16/1/2017 18:36 Playing off Zersch's original question, wouldn't it make more sense to ask if anyone who has visited the person DS has boomerang'd has been afflicted by the 'flinch'? If it has a 15% chance of working, surely by now someone would have been blocked because of it. I attached Badger night 2 (20 dmg). DS used boomerang on him. I wasn't told I was blocked. Badger didn't receive any damage. I didn't receive any damage from the boomerangs. This is still very confusing and no one has claimed to lose like 30 that night (DS' 10 + my 20).

So Lamps flinched and you guys are still picking at my role.

Good grief, blame Boc not at me ffs

Timmah @ 16/1/2017 11:35

I didn't start any of this today

You insinuated that I attacked you, when I obviously attacked Vic and he confirmed it, and thus brought the discussion back to me

Darren Sanders @ 16/1/2017 15:33

Zersch @ 16/1/2017 10:25 DS says all of his moves have a 15% chance to cause a flinch. Do you have a note on your character that says all of your moves have a ??% chance to cause something to happen? Anyone who has a KO has a percent chance to do something

Uh... No.

Darren Sanders @ 16/1/2017 15:33

Zersch @ 16/1/2017 10:25 DS says all of his moves have a 15% chance to cause a flinch. Do you have a note on your character that says all of your moves have a ??% chance to cause something to happen? Anyone who has a KO has a percent chance to do something

That's not how it works. It's not a percent chance it's more like damage counters and when your attack makes your target exceed the number of counters needed to ko them with a move, they will be ko'd.

I'm so done arguing about my role at this point. Lynch me if that's what you decide, but you'll be wrong, and you'll have lynched the one person who has no percentage at which you're ko'd.

I'll take the blame for bringing it up again.

I feel like I helped bring it up again but something doesn't feel right. It's really the perfect scum cover.

Everything Zersch said about my role is exactly right.

Let's lynch Nick or Wikey then... or mittens plz lol.

Darren Sanders @ 16/1/2017 14:36

Lamps @ 16/1/2017 9:43 spindoctor02 @ 16/1/2017 18:36 Playing off Zersch's original question, wouldn't it make more sense to ask if anyone who has visited the person DS has boomerang'd has been afflicted by the 'flinch'? If it has a 15% chance of working, surely by now someone would have been blocked because of it. I attached Badger night 2 (20 dmg). DS used boomerang on him. I wasn't told I was blocked. Badger didn't receive any damage. I didn't receive any damage from the boomerangs. This is still very confusing and no one has claimed to lose like 30 that night (DS' 10 + my 20). So Lamps flinched and you guys are still picking at my role. Good grief, blame Boc not at me ffs

Lamps did not necessarily flinch. If he did badger would still have gotten 10.

I don't know. I could see it being true. I have a nuance in my role. Not as complicated as his but it is possible.

I said this the other day but let's not start trying to lynch inactives this deep. That's perfect cover for scum. We have enough town attacks to not have to waste time and distract during the day phase.

Unless we have pretty damning evidence against one of them, then I'm cool with it.

Idk where I'm at right now. ##unlynch

Ok then mittens