it splits Jamie's name up onto 2 lines

Herm @ 22/12/2017 14:42

Never been looking at the Treestump role the same ever since DS's game.

Nothing is ever the same once you've played a DS game.

Speaking of, Where is DS?

Primate @ 22/12/2017 14:44

Speaking of, Where is DS?

Probably frequenting the alleyways of the tenderloin district.

Primate @ 22/12/2017 20:44

Speaking of, Where is DS?

Working on his role claim

DS is Town Nurse.

Herm @ 22/12/2017 14:02

Seems like Wikey isn't playing.

Herm @ 22/12/2017 14:07

## lynch Chris

Hm...

Deja vu.

Christian @ 22/12/2017 15:33

Darkus Black @ 22/12/2017 16:27 I get it as a way of taking your vote off someone just not why you have to do it before voting someone else immediately. It just adds a step that isn't required. It is a bad process. Not any more of an effort than complaining about the rule actually :P

Actually, quite the contrary. It takes quite a bit more effort complain if you compare it to XXunlynch (using XX so as to not cause confusion when finding votes).

I didn't realize Wikey wasn't playing at first either, until you pointed it out.

Snowflake poker @ 22/12/2017 16:53

Christian @ 22/12/2017 15:33 Darkus Black @ 22/12/2017 16:27 I get it as a way of taking your vote off someone just not why you have to do it before voting someone else immediately. It just adds a step that isn't required. It is a bad process. Not any more of an effort than complaining about the rule actually :P Actually, quite the contrary. It takes quite a bit more effort complain if you compare it to XXunlynch (using XX so as to not cause confusion when finding votes).

That is what I said. It takes no more effort than complaining about it, meaning the actual action of unlynching requires equal or less effort. :P

Why hasn't Wikey checked in yet? seems lazy

http://www.ndimforums.com/fe/thread.asp?threadid=6514&pp=50#377508

Curtis provided us with an order of people to lynch. I think we just start at the top and work our way down, right?

Did anyone get a partridge in a pear tree?

Spin @ 22/12/2017 16:31

Darkus Black @ 22/12/2017 14:27 I get it as a way of taking your vote off someone just not why you have to do it before voting someone else immediately. It just adds a step that isn't required. It is a bad process. It's a rule, so you have two choices. Vote in a new, better set of mods, who can remove the rule, or deal with the current rule and make sure to tell everyone you meet how terrible it is. Choice is yours. I know the one I'm up for.

Herm @ 22/12/2017 16:50

Deja vu.

Deja who?