Eddie Murphy is what the general populace would call a "Patty Melt" ?

This is really a question about the expanded definition to fit things branded as a sandwich vs the original definition TBH.

Dadd @ 12/10/2017 14:22

Eddie Murphy is what the general populace would call a "Patty Melt" ?

I don't know who Patty is, but she would melt after eating an Eddie Murphy.

Mercator @ 12/10/2017 14:22

This is really a question about the expanded definition to fit things branded as a sandwich vs the original definition TBH.

I understand- we can only call something a sandwich if eaten by the Earl of Sandwich. Granted, that eliminates peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.

vladykins @ 12/10/2017 11:59

Curtis @ 12/10/2017 10:43 Vlady doesn’t even think they’re sandwiches and is arguing just to argue, he told me in private in the middle of the night LOL-lies. I even have a working definition for sandwich that I'll share later if work permits, along with taxonomy of sandwiches. Flat bread sandwiches seem to be the only sticking point right now.

if you're going to argue hotdogs are sandwiches because SCIENCE you need to provide this information.

THE GREAT DR @ 12/10/2017 14:32

vladykins @ 12/10/2017 11:59 Curtis @ 12/10/2017 10:43 Vlady doesn’t even think they’re sandwiches and is arguing just to argue, he told me in private in the middle of the night LOL-lies. I even have a working definition for sandwich that I'll share later if work permits, along with taxonomy of sandwiches. Flat bread sandwiches seem to be the only sticking point right now. if you're going to argue hotdogs are sandwiches because SCIENCE you need to provide this information.

The definition is later in the thread.

My taxonomy of sandwiches will have to come later, but it should be interesting when I do.

vladykins @ 12/10/2017 12:29

Mercator @ 12/10/2017 14:22 This is really a question about the expanded definition to fit things branded as a sandwich vs the original definition TBH. I understand- we can only call something a sandwich if eaten by the Earl of Sandwich. Granted, that eliminates peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.

They fall under the original definition, the original definition was not his first or later sandwiches.

It is literally impossible to argue with you, I will try to never do so again.

You had to change the definition of the word sandwich to account for hotdogs

Hotdogs do not fit under the actual definition of sandwich. Thus they are not one

And that’s THAT!

I really just want a 500 page document written by Vladdy to come out of this argument. Full of charts, illustrations, analysis, debunked theories and most importantly character witness testimonies from people found in Google image search.

Vlady is a bread bowl a sandwich

Mercator @ 12/10/2017 12:36

vladykins @ 12/10/2017 12:29 Mercator @ 12/10/2017 14:22 This is really a question about the expanded definition to fit things branded as a sandwich vs the original definition TBH. I understand- we can only call something a sandwich if eaten by the Earl of Sandwich. Granted, that eliminates peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. They fall under the original definition, the original definition was not his first or later sandwiches. It is literally impossible to argue with you, I will try to never do so again.

You're the same type as flat earthers, if you were dumber you might be one.

Zersch @ 12/10/2017 15:37

I really just want a 500 page document written by Vladdy to come out of this argument. Full of charts, illustrations, analysis, debunked theories and most importantly character witness testimonies from people found in Google image search.

if he provides this i will switch my case, but if his new definition eliminates peanut butter and jelly sandwiches to make room for hotdogs he will have proven himself a con and a sham.

I like how everything Vlady says is easily countered by one sentence replies. Because it really is that fucking simple.

Mercator @ 12/10/2017 14:36

vladykins @ 12/10/2017 12:29 Mercator @ 12/10/2017 14:22 This is really a question about the expanded definition to fit things branded as a sandwich vs the original definition TBH. I understand- we can only call something a sandwich if eaten by the Earl of Sandwich. Granted, that eliminates peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. They fall under the original definition, the original definition was not his first or later sandwiches. It is literally impossible to argue with you, I will try to never do so again.

The Earl of Sandwich became known for putting meat on sandwiches. Based on the very definition you have now created for us, PB&Js are not sandwiches.

Again, they fit under my definition, but they have been eliminated by yours.

YOU TELL EM TIM!