Herm @ 9/4/2017 8:45

I see my name mentioned, busy right now but will be more available soon.

Go back to your private forum and put together a story imo.

Maddie @ 9/4/2017 7:14

HI I'm back. ALRIGHT SO--I tracked Herm last night, but my investigative reports were burned to a crisp and I didn't get any info on Herm's activity. I don't want to jump right on Herm and assume scum for the following reasons: 1.) Could be a passive protective town role? 2.) I'm assuming based on my PM that this has something to do with Herm's role, but not 100% clear if this is the case. That said, it seems a little scummy so I'd definitely like to hear from Herm about this.

I targeted you last night with my role.

I targeted Christian N1.

My role is active.

It's got a helpful use.

Herm @ 9/4/2017 8:08

Maddie @ 9/4/2017 7:14 HI I'm back. ALRIGHT SO--I tracked Herm last night, but my investigative reports were burned to a crisp and I didn't get any info on Herm's activity. I don't want to jump right on Herm and assume scum for the following reasons: 1.) Could be a passive protective town role? 2.) I'm assuming based on my PM that this has something to do with Herm's role, but not 100% clear if this is the case. That said, it seems a little scummy so I'd definitely like to hear from Herm about this. I targeted you last night with my role. I targeted Christian N1.

Why did you target Maddie? If it caused her to get no report that sounds fishy

Herm @ 9/4/2017 8:10

My role is active. It's got a helpful use.

This is like scum move 101 here

##unlynch
##lynch Herm

Not a very helpful use at all if you ask me.

Angi @ 9/4/2017 9:35

##unlynch ##lynch Herm Not a very helpful use at all if you ask me.

This assumes his role caused maddie's info that burn. He hasn't directly said that but his vagueness isn't clearing things up either. He doesn't have to fully claim but a yes/no on if his role caused it would be nice.

farlig @ 9/4/2017 8:26

Christian has a visiting role, he must be scum, really?

This wad not my reason fwiw
But I did say that just because Curtis didn't die doesn't mean he's not scum.
Could be scum role cop
Could be scum doctor
Could be town. My reasons were based on yesterday's thoughts.
I'm starting to think that those that think DS could be scum could be right

Angi @ 9/4/2017 10:35

##unlynch ##lynch Herm Not a very helpful use at all if you ask me.

Probably how Maddie would see it. I like TIB's question to Herm - why Maddie? We knew from yesterday that she (quite successfully) witnessed Ahoda visiting Sock N1. Why actively hinder that ability?

farlig @ 9/4/2017 9:38

Angi @ 9/4/2017 9:35 ##unlynch ##lynch Herm Not a very helpful use at all if you ask me. This assumes his role caused maddie's info that burn. He hasn't directly said that but his vagueness isn't clearing things up either. He doesn't have to fully claim but a yes/no on if his role caused it would be nice.

Agreed but until we get more from him.....

I don't think my role would cause that. It helps against certain scum actions, which is why I targeted her.

It's a protective role.

Protects her from getting the truth?

Herm @ 9/4/2017 10:44

I don't think my role would cause that. It helps against certain scum actions, which is why I targeted her.

Can you confirm with Brian or Tom?

thisisbad @ 9/4/2017 9:45

Protects her from getting the truth?

Lets go fishing for more information.