Yeah we need to lynch... But who?

Rob (1/10): Kiwi
Lamps (0/10): Ari
Simplton(0/10): Shadow
Wikey(1/10): Shadow
Colby(1/10): Lamps
Samm(1/10): Vic
Vic(1/10): Samm
DR(1/10): Ari, Simplton,
Greenday(1/10): Korr

What an awful day.

VIC AND SAMM, why are you two lynching each other? You did this yesterday too!

deaderrose @ 2/1/2014 21:33

What an awful day. VIC AND SAMM, why are you two lynching each other? You did this yesterday too!

Interesting point..... maybe they're scumbuddies trying to hide that by going after each other?

Sorry if I'm being captain obvious.

Wikey could be an interesting option.

Greenday @ 2/1/2014 21:35

deaderrose @ 2/1/2014 21:33 What an awful day. VIC AND SAMM, why are you two lynching each other? You did this yesterday too! Interesting point..... maybe they're scumbuddies trying to hide that by going after each other? Sorry if I'm being captain obvious.

Yeah it's a little bit on the nose if that's what they're doing, but I don't really get why they're doing it either way.

Samm @ 2/1/2014 18:39

##Lynch Vic because I'm a whiney emotional baby and that lynch was dUMB and made just for the sake of making a lynch. So I'm doing the same bIATCH. As for a Colby lynch - think that's dumb, Colby is more than a contributing member he's just travelling today. Everyone's refusing to come forward with any sort of information because they don't want to die so frankly this lynch is about as good as the day one lynch IMO.

Looking back they both did give reasons. Really silly ones!

Vic @ 2/1/2014 18:18

I feel like the people that we should be looking at are the ones that who have just said random shit to make it look like they are here but aren't actually contributing aka DR, Korr and Samm. While Colby and Wikey haven't been the most active, there is just something shady as shit to me about people just posting for the sake of posting without actually helping. For now I'm going to go ahead with ##lynch Samm

Whoops, meant to add this quote too

yeh i just lynched him to make the point that his point was stupid. on day 2 we shouldn't be looking to lynch inactives again, which honestly in a sense is pretty scummy in and of itself a statement.

Maybe we should lynch one of them.

Samm @ 2/1/2014 21:41

yeh i just lynched him to make the point that his point was stupid. on day 2 we shouldn't be looking to lynch inactives again, which honestly in a sense is pretty scummy in and of itself a statement.

...wasn't that his point though? Another slip up methinks. I agree with Kiwi, as well.

his point was to lynch inactives, which really makes no sense on day 2. was it not?

Alright, out of everyone with 1 vote (leaving out myself because fuck you)

Rob - Voted against by kiwi as a joak vote that still hasn't been unlynched. KIND OF SILLY that kiwi has a joak vote up still when he's picking apart other people's reasoning.

Wikey - Voted because he's pretty much done nothing all game so far.

Colby - I think his was an inactive vote? Colby is just out of town today though.

Samm - Vic voted Samm for goofing off. Somewhat reasonable but odd that it's happened twice.

Vic - Samm voted Vic for voting him. Odd that it's happened twice.

Greenday - Korr jumped onto my theory.

There's literally 10 minutes left in the day. Lynching one of Samm or Vic right now is the best option I think and Samm seems like a more plausible option right now.

##Lynch: Samm

(i'm not saying we should lynch vic here i'm just getting to the point that we still know shit all on day 2)