So, in your scenario, you assume 3 kills a night. Where was the 3rd kill last night? Are you assuming maddie jailed the killer? What if they are just absent (i.e. PORL)?

Day 8 Lynch Count

PORL (3/5) - Herm, TT, im317
Im317 (2/5) - Spin, Farlig, Primate

Spin @ 7/1/2018 17:58

So, in your scenario, you assume 3 kills a night. Where was the 3rd kill last night? Are you assuming maddie jailed the killer? What if they are just absent (i.e. PORL)?

Thinking worst case scenarios in my earlier post, so yeah, I'm assuming we have the same three kills a night we've had basically every night and Maddie blocked someone last night.

i just finished hell at work i’m going to cry brb

##Lynch im317

Jamie, it’s time to show your:

Helios by all means feel free to jump in here (:

oh boyo votals are tied

I just thought of something. Lemme see...

Three times during this Day, 317 referred to Porl as "inactive In-Law" (even referring to it as "the consensus"), and Herm also referred to him as "inactive In-Law". Can someone tell me how a) we know there's an inactive In-Law, and b) when Porl became that consensus?

Helios Garabandia @ 7/1/2018 19:49

Three times during this Day, 317 referred to Porl as "inactive In-Law" (even referring to it as "the consensus"), and Herm also referred to him as "inactive In-Law". Can someone tell me how a) we know there's an inactive In-Law, and b) when Porl became that consensus?

a) we don't

b) when he had move votes than anyone else.

Spin @ 7/1/2018 19:54

Helios Garabandia @ 7/1/2018 19:49 Three times during this Day, 317 referred to Porl as "inactive In-Law" (even referring to it as "the consensus"), and Herm also referred to him as "inactive In-Law". Can someone tell me how a) we know there's an inactive In-Law, and b) when Porl became that consensus? a) we don't b) when he had move votes than anyone else.

Oh, I don't think you meant consensus as far as votes go, but consensus as far as the inactive In-Law goes.

I think that was decided by im317 and Herm as a means to deflect attention from themselves, because it's basically a given that PORL won't show up to defend the attack.

Am I the only one that finds TT stanky? Looking back he should was excited to vote sock both days he got the chance.

Spin @ 7/1/2018 21:54

Helios Garabandia @ 7/1/2018 19:49 Three times during this Day, 317 referred to Porl as "inactive In-Law" (even referring to it as "the consensus"), and Herm also referred to him as "inactive In-Law". Can someone tell me how a) we know there's an inactive In-Law, and b) when Porl became that consensus? a) we don't b) when he had move votes than anyone else.

well he cant be Kids Table or they wouldn't have had anyone to submit kills from night 5 on since Rose was also inactive. as for the consensus that was about there still being 1 more member of the Kids Table.

You can move it to im317 if you want, PORL is nothing concrete.