|
Herm
Definitely not a Quran Burner
| Reputation: 212 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 29,715 | Joined: | Feb 20, 2014 |
| Post #151: 7th Jan 2018 5:04 PM | |
Mads could've possibly jailed me. | |
| | |
im317
Sole Survivor
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Legend | Posts: | 7,429 | Joined: | May 14, 2013 |
| Post #152: 7th Jan 2018 5:04 PM | |
|
##Lynch im317
If we knew going into last night that there were likely still 2 killing factions, it's pretty apparent Maddie would have been a target of at least one of them, and she died. Why didn't you protect her if you really are Town Bodyguard? |
because i protected her the night before.
so is the consensus with Porl that hes inactive In-Law? or is everyone still ignoring that the last Kids Table has to be someone active? | |
| | |
Herm
Definitely not a Quran Burner
| Reputation: 212 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 29,715 | Joined: | Feb 20, 2014 |
| Post #153: 7th Jan 2018 5:05 PM | |
Who would you lynch im317? | |
| | |
im317
Sole Survivor
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Legend | Posts: | 7,429 | Joined: | May 14, 2013 |
| Post #154: 7th Jan 2018 5:06 PM | |
|
Who would you lynch im317? |
you or Jamie. i think one of you has to be the last Kids Table. | |
| | |
Herm
Definitely not a Quran Burner
| Reputation: 212 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 29,715 | Joined: | Feb 20, 2014 |
| Post #155: 7th Jan 2018 5:09 PM | |
It's probably Jamie then.
An anagram of jamie is... I AM EJ.
Who is EJ? Probably some troublesome kid. | |
| | |
primate
Eff Ewe DADD!
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 24,154 | Joined: | Feb 21, 2015 |
| Post #156: 7th Jan 2018 5:14 PM | |
Why the push to clear out the kids table? Is it because you know town has a chance longer if there are 2 factions? | |
| | |
Spin
Milk Bowl
| Reputation: 119 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 25,300 | Joined: | Feb 18, 2015 |
| Post #157: 7th Jan 2018 5:15 PM | |
|
Why the push to clear out the kids table? Is it because you know town has a chance longer if there are 2 factions? |
I'm just waiting for the factions to start targeting each other. | |
| | |
im317
Sole Survivor
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Legend | Posts: | 7,429 | Joined: | May 14, 2013 |
| Post #158: 7th Jan 2018 5:16 PM | |
|
Why the push to clear out the kids table? Is it because you know town has a chance longer if there are 2 factions? |
because we all seem to agree they only have 1 member left. do you not want to remove a kill from the game? | |
| | |
primate
Eff Ewe DADD!
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 24,154 | Joined: | Feb 21, 2015 |
| Post #159: 7th Jan 2018 5:16 PM | |
I mean, I can see wanting to get rid of a killer, but is that kind of cancelled out by the fact that neither mafia can win without finishing off the other? | |
| | |
primate
Eff Ewe DADD!
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 24,154 | Joined: | Feb 21, 2015 |
| Post #160: 7th Jan 2018 5:16 PM | |
And removing one faction would put the other much closer to a win. | |
| | |
primate
Eff Ewe DADD!
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 24,154 | Joined: | Feb 21, 2015 |
| Post #161: 7th Jan 2018 5:18 PM | |
I really want to hear from Jamie. | |
| | |
primate
Eff Ewe DADD!
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 24,154 | Joined: | Feb 21, 2015 |
| Post #162: 7th Jan 2018 5:19 PM | |
|
And removing one faction would put the other much closer to a win. |
So might it be best to keep the kid's table around and force the in laws to use their kill on them.
It's an honest question. I'm looking for thoughts here. | |
| | |
im317
Sole Survivor
| Reputation: 102 | Group: | Legend | Posts: | 7,429 | Joined: | May 14, 2013 |
| Post #163: 7th Jan 2018 5:20 PM | |
|
And removing one faction would put the other much closer to a win. |
idk who the 3rd scum left is. i figure its Jamie as last Kids Table, Porl as inactive In-Law but idk who the active In-Law is. so you want to lynch Porl to make it 1-1?
i can live with that i guess
##lynch Porl | |
| | |
Herm
Definitely not a Quran Burner
| Reputation: 212 | Group: | Godfather | Posts: | 29,715 | Joined: | Feb 20, 2014 |
| Post #164: 7th Jan 2018 5:42 PM | |
I don't see them targeting each other. | |
| | |
Helios Garabandia
Kroeger
| Reputation: 11 | Group: | Elite | Posts: | 3,082 | Joined: | Aug 14, 2012 |
| Post #165: 7th Jan 2018 5:46 PM | |
|
|
And removing one faction would put the other much closer to a win. |
So might it be best to keep the kid's table around and force the in laws to use their kill on them.
It's an honest question. I'm looking for thoughts here. |
Let's see.
We assume that Kids Table has one left and that In-Laws have two left. We also assume there's some kind of third kill out there (I lean SKIT over Vig based on kill count through the game, but we can debate that). We currently have 9 alive. Based on counts and our assumptions, that means 5-6 Town and 3-4 Scum, depending on where you fall on SKIT v Vig debate.
Worst Case Scenarios:
(worst case scenarios assume all deaths are Town-aligned unless otherwise mentioned)
IF we Lynch Kids Table, then we get two kills tonight, and we start D9 with 6 alive. If our third killer is one of the two that gets killed during Night 8, then we are 100% at MyLo, because we'd be at 4 Town v 2 In-Law. If our third killer is still alive, then we are sorta at MyLo, because we'd be at 2 In-Law v 3/4 Town (v 1 SKIT), and a scum faction has to eliminate all threats to them to win, and a killer counts as a threat.
If we lynch an In-Law today, then we get three kills tonight, and we start D9 with 5. No faction has the ability to win on D9 (it'd be 1 KT v 1 In-Law v 2/3 Town (v 1 SKIT)),and nobody can clinch there, but if worst case scenario happens and we lose a Townie, we could have three MORE kills, leaving one alive at the start of D10.
If we lynch Town today, we get three kills tonight, and we start D9 with 5. Interestingly, even if all the kills were on Town, we aren't at LyLo because we'd be at 1 KT v 2 In-Law v 1/2 Town (v 1 SKIT) and even though In-Laws would have 50% if they both survive D9, there'd still be at least one killer out there that In-Laws would have to deal with it before winning.
Basically, after writing this all up, I feel like In-Laws have more paths to victory if they're both alive, but reducing the number of kills also helps us. Also, if we had a Vig over a SKIT, we're in MUCH better shape, but if we have a SKIT over a Vig, then we have a bit of a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
You know Helios is scum when he summarizes everything and then adds to the discussion by picking out one random sentence someone says and writes an italicized diatribe about how it's curious and he really, REALLY wants to know more about it.
"What did you mean by this, though? You are eating a biscuit? A BISCUIT???? Seems a little farfetched to me. Really gonna need to hear more about this biscuit situation." | Yes
With some form of over the top, “Wait, what the actual fuck?!” thrown in
| A biscuit? Are you FUCKING KIDDING ME?
Say it with me... inactive biscuit is still biscuit. And my key to victory. |
|
|
|
sorry that was rude of me. angi*, rose*, ahoda*
|
|
|
| | |
3 Users Viewing (3 Guests) |
|
|