Spin @ 22/2/2018 13:47

There are only 20 liberals?!?!? Either that or Vlady is like 5 million different people.

I'm going to guess you hadn't realized Igor is dumb as shit and is legally retarded.

Spin @ 22/2/2018 13:47

There are only 20 liberals?!?!? Either that or Vlady is like 5 million different people.

Vlady is clearly an amalgam of a thousands of people
But I guarantee you the idiots yapping about taking away guns on Facebook don't know shit

madykins

I also don't think Igor realizes there's a difference between "leftists" and "liberals."

Hey Igor, please define what the word amalgram means

Mads @ 22/2/2018 13:51

I also don't think Igor realizes there's a difference between "leftists" and "liberals."

Leftists are complete and utter garbage.
But liberals are all pretty much the same on taking away gunz

Ahoda thought you said 'anal'gram and got excited.

Timmah @ 22/2/2018 13:53

Ahoda thought you said 'anal'gram and got excited.

I did not but when someone tries to use big words but they have no idea what they are saying, I find it hilarious.

Your gun won't protect you if your house is broken into (if you have it safely stored).

Your gun won't protect you from the government if they really want what you have.

All they are is expensive toys that make you feel more powerful. They make pills for that now.

Ahoda @ 22/2/2018 13:55

Timmah @ 22/2/2018 13:53 Ahoda thought you said 'anal'gram and got excited. I did not but when someone tries to use big words but they have no idea what they are saying, I find it hilarious.

INCONCEIVABLE!

Igor @ 22/2/2018 14:52

Mads @ 22/2/2018 13:51 I also don't think Igor realizes there's a difference between "leftists" and "liberals." Leftists are complete and utter garbage. But liberals are all pretty much the same on taking away gunz

This is false. I see a lot of division between people who want all-out bans, bans on specific guns, or just better legislation on background checks and methods of purchase. There's also a whole other debate over researching gun violence from a public health perspective.

Nydia Velázquez's bill, H.R.3987 - Protecting Americans from Gun Violence Act of 2017, is one to look into. It would place a fee on background checks and the revenue from those fees would fund gun violence research at the CDC. It's probably not a perfect bill, but I agree with the general premise. Most of the cosponsors are from the Progressive Caucus, though, so I doubt it will get any movement in this Congress.

Spin @ 22/2/2018 13:56

Your gun won't protect you if your house is broken into (if you have it safely stored). Your gun won't protect you from the government if they really want what you have. All they are is expensive toys that make you feel more powerful. They make pills for that now.

Those are all irrelevant.
Its a freedom/right you deserve to have.
Not worth debating those points

Spin @ 22/2/2018 13:56

Your gun won't protect you if your house is broken into (if you have it safely stored). Your gun won't protect you from the government if they really want what you have. All they are is expensive toys that make you feel more powerful. They make pills for that now.

Oh, yeah? Well what about the zombie apocalypse?!

Ahoda @ 22/2/2018 13:51

Hey Igor, please define what the word amalgram means

Hey Igor.....I'm still waiting.

Igor @ 22/2/2018 12:58

Spin @ 22/2/2018 13:56 Your gun won't protect you if your house is broken into (if you have it safely stored). Your gun won't protect you from the government if they really want what you have. All they are is expensive toys that make you feel more powerful. They make pills for that now. Those are all irrelevant. Its a freedom/right you deserve to have. Not worth debating those points

It was relevant in 1780s. It was maybe relevant in the 1860s. It sure as hell isnt relevant now in this modern society.

#repealthe2nd