Primate @ 29/12/2017 9:11

Bryce @ 29/12/2017 7:27 Stocking @ 29/12/2017 0:12 Primate @ 29/12/2017 4:04 Sockie, Why didn't you mention the bp thing yesterday? Who are your top scum reads? Top scum reads: Chris, Porl, Garlic But Chris is town DId I miss a claim or something?

Bitch, I'm always town.

Chris25 @ 29/12/2017 10:17

Primate @ 29/12/2017 9:11 Bryce @ 29/12/2017 7:27 Stocking @ 29/12/2017 0:12 Primate @ 29/12/2017 4:04 Sockie, Why didn't you mention the bp thing yesterday? Who are your top scum reads? Top scum reads: Chris, Porl, Garlic But Chris is town DId I miss a claim or something? Bitch, I'm always town.

So is Sock.

Darkus Black @ 29/12/2017 4:52

What do we know about Timmah?

We know that Timmah is TOWN! Well, I know that anyway.

Town Doc is dead. Odds are that with that info, both Sock and TIB are scum. Sock could be kid's table or in-law gf/leader, or perhaps SK, or maybe his faction has a doc, but I do not buy the 1-shot bp vig claim, or the claim that he was blocked. We're missing blocks if that is true, right? And kills from previous nights.

TIB could potentially be something not scum, but it is very unlikely.

Notice how spin has just completely faded into the background after being so vocal about how nofo was scum on D1 and D2? Still seems very shady to me. I think I may lean towards some sort of solo 3rd party though, but that's just me trying too hard to think through it.

I don't think farlig is in-law, based on his arguments against Lamps. Could still be kid's table, I suppose.

Would be funny if DS is really in-law and fake claimed without pressure as a tactic.

Timmah @ 29/12/2017 10:34

Would be funny if DS is really in-law and fake claimed without pressure as a tactic.

I'm pretty sure I made this conspiracy theory D1 or D2. It wouldn't be unheard of for DS to do something like that so definitely something to keep in mind as the game proceeds.

Most scum is going to sit back and let this one ride out since we appear to have sock dead to rights. They won't risk sticking their foot in their mouth, so let's keep an eye on people who show up but don't really say anything or do much more than post just to not be "lurking".

Bunch of people were on when I was posting an hour ago and never said a word.

If the hosts could stop posting people that survive an attack until about 2 hours before the deadline that would be great.

Snowflake poker @ 29/12/2017 7:37

Timmah @ 29/12/2017 10:34 Would be funny if DS is really in-law and fake claimed without pressure as a tactic. I'm pretty sure I made this conspiracy theory D1 or D2. It wouldn't be unheard of for DS to do something like that so definitely something to keep in mind as the game proceeds.

This argument is always made and is probably true enough to continue to be made.

Just because Jamie isn't in-law doesn't make me think he's not scum

Darkus Black @ 29/12/2017 5:52

What do we know about Timmah?

Ummm what was this post? lol

Just strikes me as odd. idk Darkus, what do you know about him?

DsssssssS @ 28/12/2017 19:55

Buffy @ 28/12/2017 19:49 DS, curious as to why you didn't check Sock to see if he was in-law since he said he killed Curtis, and given how Lamps flipped? I dont really understand that question tbh. Why would Lamps' flip make me think Sock was in-law?

Primate @ 29/12/2017 10:11

Bryce @ 29/12/2017 7:27 Stocking @ 29/12/2017 0:12 Primate @ 29/12/2017 4:04 Sockie, Why didn't you mention the bp thing yesterday? Who are your top scum reads? Top scum reads: Chris, Porl, Garlic But Chris is town DId I miss a claim or something?

No. That's just all he ever says, besides the usual slurs as he tries to go for shock value. We really should just start policy-lynching him D1 from now on.

I do agree with Farlig that Sock's 3 top scum reads are taking the easy way out.

DsssssssS @ 29/12/2017 13:23

DsssssssS @ 28/12/2017 19:55 Buffy @ 28/12/2017 19:49 DS, curious as to why you didn't check Sock to see if he was in-law since he said he killed Curtis, and given how Lamps flipped? I dont really understand that question tbh. Why would Lamps' flip make me think Sock was in-law?

Why wouldn't it? IF Sock really killed Curtis then he's not at the kids' table (although, not saying we should take everything he says as gospel, obviously). With the Lamps flip, it occurs to me, at least, that there might be two mafia groups and maybe not even a lone SK in the game and that maybe Sock is with the in-laws.

It doesn't matter in retrospect, and since Socks is getting lynched today. I was just curious.

lol that "really" was supposed to be in italics, not crossed out. So much for dramatic effect.